health

PSA test discussions should stress potential harms, ACP says

NEWS IN BRIEF — Posted April 15, 2013

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

New guidelines encourage physicians to discuss the limited benefits and substantial harms of the prostate-specific antigen test with male patients age 50 to 69. Only men in that age group who express a clear preference for screening should receive a PSA test, said the guidance, which was issued by the American College of Physicians.

The recommendations were published in the April 9 issue of Annals of Internal Medicine. They include talking points for doctors to help them explain the benefits and harms of prostate cancer screening and treatment. Those potential harms include impotence, infection and urinary incontinence, the ACP said (link).

Although 16.7% of men will receive a diagnosis of prostate cancer in their lifetime, only 2.9% will eventually die of the disease, the guidance statement said. The ACP recommends against PSA testing in average-risk men who are younger than 50, older than 69, or who have a life expectancy of less than 10 to 15 years. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends against PSA-based screening for prostate cancer.

In developing its new recommendations, the ACP Clinical Guidelines Committee assessed four U.S. prostate cancer screening guidelines. The guidelines were issued by the American College of Preventive Medicine, the American Cancer Society, the American Urological Assn. and the task force.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story