Opinion

Drop current medical tort system in favor of arbitration boards

LETTER — Posted Feb. 16, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Recently I spent two weeks in a courtroom, and the two months prior in preparation for that appearance. Going to the courthouse every day, I was comforted, in an uncomfortable way, at the sight of other physicians. I nervously joked that it was like attending grand rounds. They, too, were there for malpractice cases.

After an emotionally arduous two weeks, the jury returned a verdict in my favor. The system seemed to work in the end, but I submit that it failed miserably for letting my case go as far as it did.

What every doctor knows, legislators refuse to admit. We physicians learn very early in our practical training that the No. 2 priority, second only to "above all do no harm," is "cover your backside" (CYA, for short).

The cost of defensive medicine has been estimated at $50 billion a year. Still, legislators listen much more closely to the self-proclaimed public advocates -- personal injury attorneys.

If being sued was used to judge a doctor's proficiency, there would be few doctors, if any, or hospitals to which we could refer. Daily I make referrals to doctors who have been sued and even some who have lost multimillion-dollar malpractice cases. These are doctors, as myself, who while in medical school never dreamed that depositions, subpoenas, courtrooms and bills of particulars would enter into their discussions as much as diagnostics, treatment plans and bedside manner.

Any sincere attempt at saving our health care system must include a revamping of our present approach to malpractice. I propose the creation of an arbitration board of doctors, judges, legislators and laypersons to hear cases of suspected malpractice. The nonphysician members of the board would be required to undergo basic training in medical terminology, procedure and treatment. The board would be elected or appointed within a congressional district or county.

Attorneys representing a possible victim of malpractice would bring the case to the board. After careful review of the evidence, if the board deems malpractice was committed, then the person would receive 100% of the determined allocation for damages. Health insurance companies would be mandated to contribute a portion of every person's health care premium into this malpractice fund, from which the award would be drawn. The doctor who committed malpractice would be referred to the regional medical society for further review and possible referral to the state medical board.

We will all lose if malpractice reform is not addressed. Our access to health care will be greatly limited and the cost will be unaffordable.

Charles F. Glassman, MD, Pomona, N.Y.

Note: This item originally appeared at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2004/02/16/edlt0216.htm.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn