Opinion

"Gold" and "green" roads provide best paths for open access to journals

LETTER — Posted May 10, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Regarding "Journal free for all" (Article, April 19): Your article reports on the fact that access to research output is blocked by access tolls and that open-access journals such as Public Library of Science's PLoS Biology could be providing a remedy.

But your reporting overlooks another, faster, surer remedy.

There exist today 24,000 research journals (across all disciplines and languages, worldwide) publishing about 2.4 million articles per year. There are fewer than 1,000 open-access journals like the PLoS and BioMed Central journals, publishing about 100,000 articles per year.

What about access to the 2.3 million articles for which there exists no suitable open-access journal today? Should researchers wait for 23,000 more open-access journals to be created one by one? It's likely to be a long, long wait. Yet there is another road to open access, and that is for the authors of those 2.3 million articles in those 23,000 journals to self-archive them on their own institution's Web site. That will make them all open access overnight.

These two complementary roads have come to be called the "golden" and "green" roads to open access. Publishing in open-access journals is the golden road, but with only 1,000 journals, this road alone is too narrow, slow and uncertain.

The green road is to publish in conventional journals but also to self-archive the article on the author's institutional Web site. The color "green" comes from the fact that nearly 60% of publishers have already shown their support for open access by giving their authors the official green light to self-archive, but without the journal itself needing to take the risk of converting to gold.

The green road already provides at least three times as much open access as the golden road, but it could be providing far more. The longer we wait, the bigger will be our growing daily, weekly, monthly and yearly loss of research impact because of access denial to would-be users worldwide.

This represents a huge needless cumulative loss of research progress and productivity for researchers, their institutions, their funders and ultimately for the taxpayers who fund the funders. It's time for universities and research funders to do something about it.

Stevan Harnad, PhD, Canada research chair, Cognitive Neuroscience Centre, University of Quebec at Montreal

Note: This item originally appeared at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2004/05/10/edlt0510.htm.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn