Verdict a victory against sham review

LETTER — Posted Oct. 25, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Regarding "Defamation award could chill peer review" (Article, Oct. 4): The recent win for ethical medicine, the case of Lawrence Poliner, MD, vs. Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas and three physicians, should indeed "send shivers down the spines" of unethical physicians and unethical hospital CEOs everywhere, who utilize sham peer review as a tool to silence physician whistle-blowers, eliminate competition or rid themselves of physicians they dislike.

Hospital CEOs and physicians who set out to destroy another physician's career, under the pretext of peer review, deserve to be punished severely. Physicians who conduct or participate in sham peer review also should have their medical society memberships terminated for their egregious violation of medical ethics.

The increasing prevalence of sham peer review damages not just the targeted physician victims, but also the integrity of the entire peer review process itself. Sham peer review is also doing great harm to quality of care and patient safety, as many physicians are afraid to point out deficiencies, problems or safety issues in the hospital setting, lest they risk retaliation by the hospital and the end of their careers.

Ethical physicians must support good-faith peer review, must condemn the practice of sham peer review and must hold the shammers fully accountable for their professional misconduct.

Eliminating the absolute immunity provision of the Health Care Quality Improvement Act, which has been used as a shield to protect the shammers, is absolutely essential for accountability and the return to ethical medicine.

Lawrence R. Huntoon, MD, PhD, Jamestown, N.Y.

Editor's note: Dr. Huntoon is editor-in-chief of the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons and chair of the Sham Peer Review Committee of the Assn. of American Physicians and Surgeons Inc.

Note: This item originally appeared at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2004/10/25/edlt1025.htm.

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn