Opinion

The best future for EMRs would be single, national system

LETTER — Posted Oct. 3, 2005

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Regarding "Fear of commitment: Weighing costs and benefits of information technology" (Article, June 27): This article discussed the fear that most physicians have about the cost of implementing electronic medical records into their practices.

The concept is not the problem; it is almost universally accepted. The problem lies in the prohibitive cost of implementing and maintaining such a system privately at a time when liability premiums are very high, along with increasing overhead costs and decreasing remuneration by all payers. Unlike other areas of our society, there is no "big daddy" that will come and offer any financial help to physicians to be able to afford this very costly improvement.

There has been some speculation that the Dept. of Veterans Affairs might be able to supply their system to physicians and hospitals at no or very little cost to them. The VA system is considered one of the best EMR systems out there at present, being upgraded constantly in a similar fashion across several hundred facilities nationwide. Everyone knowledgeable in medical IT agrees that the best possible situation would be for every medical facility to have the same system. Communication between systems would thus not be a problem, and upgrades could be implemented rapidly and uniformly across the country (as is already being done now in the VA's system).

I realize that private vendors are salivating at what they can make outfitting physicians and hospitals with their often different proprietary systems. But wouldn't it be much better and much cheaper to have the same system nationwide and being upgraded for everyone at the same time? And wouldn't it be better to have a system that would be the most inexpensive for the country and its physicians and the best way to make sure every medical facility and doctor would be in sync with health care delivery? I think the Congress might look into facilitating such an implementation, since they are already gung ho about all physicians implementing EMR into their practices.

David R. Jackson, MD, Florence, Mass.

Note: This item originally appeared at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2005/10/03/edlt1003.htm.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn