Opinion

Conscience clause laws undermine appropriate care for patients

LETTER — Posted April 3, 2006

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Regarding "Broader conscience clauses would expand physicians' right of refusal" (Article, March 6): As a gynecologist supportive of reproductive rights, I am extremely concerned by attitudes expressed by several physicians in your article.

While I'm certainly respectful of any colleague's personal beliefs, we all have obligations to provide appropriate health care to our patients. We might not always agree with our patients' decisions, but when we insert our own personal morals into the picture, we may no longer be providing evidence-based standard care.

I'm particularly troubled by the opinion expressed by the executive director of the Assn. of American Physicians and Surgeons that a potential undesired pregnancy is not an emergency and that "a mother's life is not going to end if she gets pregnant and she was careless enough to not take the proper precautions." In some cases, that is not at all true.

Women are victims of sexual assault, incest, condom breakage and sexual coercion on a daily basis. Undesired pregnancy should be prevented as early and effectively as possible through a widespread availability of emergency contraception. Emergency contraception can significantly reduce the need for abortion.

Our colleagues on both sides of the abortion issue should be able to find common ground and not develop unnecessary and potentially harmful "opt-out" clauses that would impede the availability of emergency contraception.

I am horrified by the thought that any of us can insert our own morality and religious biases into patient care, and even more so that some physicians would desire to see this codified in the law in the form of conscience clauses. This is unethical, will impede the delivery of evidence-based health care and have a disastrous effect on public health.

David Toub, MD, Wyncote, Pa.

Note: This item originally appeared at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2006/04/03/edlt0403.htm.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn