Profession

AMA house seats professional interest medical associations

NEWS IN BRIEF — Posted July 10, 2006

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The Korean American Medical Assn. and the American Assn. of Physicians of Indian Origin were granted representation in the AMA's House of Delegates, becoming the Association's first professional interest medical associations.

AMA policy calls PIMAs "organizations that relate to physicians along dimensions that are primarily ethnic, cultural, demographic, minority, etc., and are neither state associations nor specialty societies."

To be considered for admission as PIMAs, organizations must be national in scope and have more than 1,000 members, at least half of whom are physicians. They must also participate in the Specialty and Service Society for at least three years and have at least 250 AMA members.Delegates want DEA to change tune on pain control

The AMA House of Delegates directed the Association to work with the Drug Enforcement Administration to devise "a rational and realistic set" of frequently asked questions to guide physicians, law-enforcement officials and regulators in how to provide appropriate pain management while minimizing drug abuse and diversion.

The house action at the American Medical Association Annual Meeting in June was in response to the DEA's October 2004 withdrawal of a set of FAQs that were negotiated over a two-year period and had been greeted warmly by the physician community when unveiled in August 2004. After withdrawing the FAQs, the DEA published an interim policy statement in the federal register disavowing them and reserving the right to investigate physicians solely because they were high opioid prescribers.

The house also directed the AMA to urge the DEA to reaffirm a previous legal interpretation that allowed physicians to issue prescriptions marked "do not fill" until a later date.

Separately, the house directed the AMA to secure an amendment to a DEA regulation to allow pharmacies to fill an oral or computer-generated electronic prescription for a Schedule II controlled substance for a hospice patient. Though some states allow for such prescriptions for hospice patients, the DEA regulation banning the practice supersedes state rules.

Note: This item originally appeared at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2006/07/10/prbf0710.htm.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn