Judge lowers award dollars in peer review case, lets findings stand

NEWS IN BRIEF — Posted Oct. 16, 2006

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

A Texas federal judge in September reduced a multimillion-dollar jury award to a physician but upheld the unlawful peer review ruling against a hospital and three cardiologists.

U.S. District Court Judge Jorge A. Solis in the Northern District of Texas knocked down the overall damage award against Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas and the peer review committee doctors from $366 million to $22.54 million in his ruling in favor of Dallas cardiologist Lawrence R. Poliner, MD. Solis found that jurors had awarded multiple damages for the same claims and determined that the jury's original verdict of more than $200 million for punitive and mental anguish damages was "excessive."

The court denied Presbyterian's request for a new trial, finding that Dr. Poliner's previously "unblemished" career was "decimated" after his privileges were unfairly suspended.

Michael P. Lynn, one of Dr. Poliner's attorneys, said they expected the reduced award but that it was "critical" that the court upheld the jury verdict "to vindicate Dr. Poliner, and through him the other doctors who have been abused by baseless peer reviews."

The 2004 jury verdict captured the attention of the medical community, with some doctors, fearing it would chill peer review participation.

Thomas S. Leatherbury, a lawyer for Presbyterian and the defendant doctors, did not return calls for comment. But a spokesman for Texas Health Resources, Presbyterian's parent company, said the hospital planned to appeal the ruling.

Note: This item originally appeared at

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn