Opinion

Greater transparency needed in how insurers account for care costs

LETTER — Posted Jan. 12, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Regarding "Finding the right floor: How much should insurers spend on medical care?" (Article, Nov. 24, 2008): A broad view of the costs of providing medical care certainly should include the administrative costs of the insurers, at the least as a prominent sidebar.

But that doesn't go far enough. Bill-review companies working for insurers in California are frequently separate companies, located out of state. Their money comes out of what otherwise should be spent on patient care.

Now there is yet another layer to this administrative morass in the form of the companies that generate databanks, which distort medical research results allegedly to promote the practice of evidence-based medicine. I don't need coaching from some bureaucrat relying on a table about how to properly treat the straightforward, classical case of some disease.

Multiple-diagnosis patients and those instances of patients with multiple risk factors don't fit within cookie-cutter algorithms. We all know that those tables primarily are intended as tools to make profits for insurers, not help ensure the best care.

We should include in the figures about overhead the salaries of all health professionals who cost me unbillable time and stress, because they have the right to demand telephone conversations and/or lengthy reports (also nonbillable) with and from me, explaining to them my complicated cases, which are numerous.

I would be interested if these additional "administrative costs" are included in the medical-loss ratio figures that you provided in your provocative article. I would bet not. At the least, we need full transparency from these companies that are dealing with what should be a basic human right, i.e., health care. I would be glad to pay the price of transparency in my own bookkeeping.

Clifford J. Straehley III, MD, Fair Oaks, Calif.

Note: This item originally appeared at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2009/01/12/edlt0112.htm.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn