Public solicitation of organ donors grabs the spotlight

The UNOS board of directors is slated to address individuals' efforts in obtaining an organ just as such efforts are generating more media attention.

By Andis Robeznieks — Posted Nov. 15, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Recent medical ethics-related news stories have taken on a tone that runs disturbingly close to that of the Jerry Springer show.

A man convicted of selling LSD recently donated a kidney to a stranger who advertised his desperate need for an organ on a commercial Web site. The donor later surrendered to sheriff's deputies and is jailed, while still taking medication, for failing to pay a reported $10,000 in child support.

Another man whose medical tests disqualified his potential kidney donation to a stranger is now suing the man in a Wisconsin small claims court for travel expenses and the wages he lost while taking a day off work to speak to the media about the transplant.

Even as the United Network for Organ Sharing is working on a policy to address public solicitation for organ donations, the situation is threatening to spin out of the organization's control.

And experts are starting to wonder whether the organ allocation system will still be able to steer donated organs to those who most need them in a fair and equitable manner.

An Internet-arranged transplant was performed at Denver's Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center by surgeon Igal Kam, MD, who said his first commercially facilitated transplant will also be his last.

"The concern that I have all the time is that commercially arranged transplants will have people going through the back door and exchanging money for organs in the United States," Dr. Kam said. "I am not going to, at this stage, perform any arranged transplants because of these concerns.

"I'm not sure we can play police and get to the bottom of somebody's motivations," he added. "I personally don't want to be related to any connection like this."

Upon learning how the transplant had been arranged, Dr. Kam initially postponed the operation, which was originally scheduled for Oct. 18. The hospital's clinical ethics committee was convened, and the transplant was performed two days later after both the donor and the recipient signed statements that neither was profiting from the transplant.

The hospital also issued a statement that the operation should not be construed as an endorsement of a "commercial donor organization."

Attracting public attention

Robert Sade, MD, of the AMA Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs and a former member of the UNOS ethics committee, said public solicitation and directed donation -- where the donor or deceased donor's family directs a donated organ to a specific individual -- are not new issues, but they have never attracted so much public attention.

"It's always been low-profile," said Dr. Sade. "The question is, will these public solicitations increase the organ pool or will they -- because of negative publicity -- decrease it?"

The issue received media attention this summer when a Houston man mounted a successful billboard and Internet advertising campaign for a new liver. Several others in need of organs have followed suit and created their own Web sites.

Ethical concerns were heightened last month when, which charges $295 a month to allow people on the organ waiting list to advertise for the organ they need, announced it had arranged its first transplant between strangers from Colorado and Tennessee.

CEJA will present a report on living organ donors to the AMA House of Delegates when it meets in December, said Dr. Sade, who also noted that, according to CEJA policy, paying for organs is unethical, but it is ethical to reimburse living donors for the expenses they incur in the course of making an organ donation.

UNOS spokeswoman Annie Moore said the organization's board of directors is scheduled to address public solicitation at its Nov. 18-19 meeting in Washington, D.C.

UNOS released a statement in June noting its philosophical opposition to, saying it exploits vulnerable populations and "subverts the equitable allocation of organs for transplantation."

"Our primary concern is maintaining equity and public trust in the national transplant system," Moore said. "Any perceived favoritism or differential treatment could weaken public trust and potentially make people less willing to become donors -- which would hurt all transplant patients."

Handing out flyers

Public solicitations do not always involve spending money on billboards and Internet sites.

Nola Breiling, the significant other of Norbert Sebunia, was passing out flyers advertising Sebunia's need for a kidney at the Lions Day Parade in Sussex, Wis.

When she returned home, she received a call from a man who said he wanted to donate one of his kidneys.

Breiling said she and Sebunia agreed to pay the donor for gasoline to drive to Rochester, Minn., where tests would be performed at the Mayo Clinic, plus four days of lost wages and four nights lodging expenses.

Tests showed that the man was an unsuitable donor.

He is now seeking additional compensation, and a Nov. 15 small claims court date in Waukesha County Circuit Court has been set.

Charlie Fiske, founder of Family Inn in Brookline, Mass., a place family members of patients waiting for an organ transplant can stay, sympathizes with those making public solicitations. He did the same thing on behalf of his 11-month-old daughter 22 years ago. But he said the medical community must resolve the ethical issues.

"[Public solicitation] removes organ transplants further away from the medical community and into the hands of public enterprise," he said. "That in itself is neither bad nor good, but it raises ethical questions. It creates an issue of the haves and the have-nots, and the process needs to be transparent.

"The medical community really needs to step up to the plate and ask: Is the system being responsive?" Fiske added.

"If it isn't, people who are facing a death sentence, they'll step outside the system."

Back to top


One man's plight

For $295 a month, will post a description and the requirements of people needing an organ donation. The information condensed below helped motivate Robert Smitty to donate a kidney to Bob Hickey.

In December 1997, I was diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma. I had my left kidney removed on Jan. 8, 1998. Almost immediately, my remaining kidney began failing. By March 1999, I was required to start dialysis.

Even though I do dialysis, I have little energy. I used to run four miles four times per week. Now I can barely get up stairs.

I need a donor ASAP. All the donor expenses are paid by my insurance carrier. Kidney harvesting is now done by laparoscope which requires three-to-four-day recovery time for the organ donor rather than the old protocol which required four-to-six-week recovery.

If you can help me I would be eternally grateful!!! Alive donor for a kidney would be a Godsend for me!


Back to top

Going public

January 2004 is launched. It offers a Web site for individuals who need organs to post their stories for $295 a month.

June The United Network for Organ Sharing creates a committee to address public solicitations for organs. It also issues a resolution noting its opposition to

July/August A Web page and billboard advertising campaign is launched publicizing the need of a Houston man, Todd Krampitz, for a liver. Media coverage motivates the family of a deceased organ donor in another state to direct the liver to Krampitz.

September Inspired by Krampitz's success, other personal organ-solicitation Web sites are launched.

Oct. 13 announces that it has arranged its first transplant. A Tennessee man volunteers to give a kidney to a stranger in Colorado. Surgery is set for Oct. 18 at Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center in Denver.

Oct. 18 Igal Kam, MD, postpones the surgery, saying there are too many unanswered questions about the transplant arrangement.

Oct. 20 Dr. Kam performs the operation, but only after the men involved sign documents attesting that they are not profiting from the transplant. The hospital issues a statement saying that performing the transplant doesn't mean it approves of the way it was arranged.

Nov. 18-19 Public solicitation for organs is on the agenda for the UNOS board of directors meeting.

Sources: UNOS;;; Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center

Back to top

External links

AMA policy on financial incentives for organ donation (link)

Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center statement regarding commercially facilitated kidney transplant, Oct. 19 (link) (link)

Presbyterian/St. Luke's Medical Center statement on continued ethical debate over commercially arranged transplant surgery, Oct. 22 (link)

Todd Krampitz Web site (link)

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn