Business

Transcription firms pledge to show what you're paying for

Inspired by physician complaints and by probes into billing, the industry is taking steps to make its charges more transparent and simpler for its clients.

By Tyler Chin — Posted June 27, 2005

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Peoria (Ill.) Surgical Group pays about $100,000 annually for transcription services, $60,000 of that to two companies that charge 11.5 cents per line. It sounds like a fairly straightforward arrangement, but because the definition of "line" is so fluid from company to company, the group has no idea if it's paying too much for transcription.

The practice could audit the billing by going through all transcribed reports, but that would be too time-consuming and probably cost more than whatever improper charges it might uncover, said Stuart Patty, administrator of the 15-physician orthopedic group. "There's no way I can tell exactly what I am or am not paying for," he said. "I think for the most part, you have to trust the people whom you work with."

But lately, some transcription companies have begun to realize that "trust me" might not be enough. Lack of transparency in billing is a problem that the industry has been attempting to address in recent years in response to clients' demands. The trend toward transparency won't necessarily lead to lower prices, observers say, but physicians should get a better sense of what they're paying for.

A work group of the Medical Transcription Industry Alliance, which represents transcription companies, soon will explore developing a billing standard for the industry, said the alliance's president, Sean Carroll.

Right now, depending on the company or transcriptionist, a physician could be charged by the line, by the page or by the report, making it difficult to compare different company's rates. Plus, depending on how many characters a company puts in a line, the definition of a line or a page could be different from transcriptionist to transcriptionist.

While the industry as a whole starts work on billing standards, some individual companies are pledging to make it easier for physicians to figure out their transcription bills.

On June 7, Mount Laurel, N.J.-based MedQuist, which bills itself as the world's leading transcription company, announced that it is dropping a line-counting method it characterized as ambiguous in favor of "more verifiable and clearly defined" alternatives.

Earlier this year, MedQuist disclosed that problems with its billing system had caused it to overcharge some clients. The Securities and Exchange Commission is investigating the publicly traded company, which is cooperating with the investigation. But MedQuist's recent moves are unrelated to the company's billing problems, said Terry Cameron, the firm's vice president of marketing.

Standards once existed

Transparency and standards in transcription billing were supposed to have been settled long before now.

In 1994, the American Assn. for Medical Transcription, a group representing individual transcriptionists, recommended a 65-character count as a definition of a line in an attempt to set an industry standard. But the association renounced that definition in 1998 because companies routinely misapplied it, said Lea Sims, AAMT's director of communications and publications.

Today, it is common practice in the fragmented transcription industry to charge doctors and hospitals by the line. But the definition of a line depends on whether a company counts only visible keystrokes, such as letters or numbers, or counts so-called hidden keystrokes, such as bold type, underline type and spaces. Another problem is that companies use a variety of billing methods, including charging by the page and report.

"All of this would be solved if the industry associations that purport to represent us would simply come up with a single solid method and then have people sign up to it and submit to external audits," said David Iwinski Jr., CEO of Acusis, a Pittsburgh-based transcription firm. "If they would do that, this problem would go away overnight."

Setting standards again

Two years ago, MTIA released a statement of principles to promote best billing practices. But for the most part, it's still left to individual companies to make their billing more transparent. For its part, AAMT likely will not engage in any more definitions for billing, Sims said.

MedQuist's solution is to offer its physician and hospital clients a choice of up to nine "billing units of measure." At this time, the company isn't publicly disclosing the billing methods it's using except to clients, Cameron said, adding that they aren't new to the industry.

Those measures will include per-line billing, but the country's largest transcription firm won't use the "AAMT line billing of measure" any longer because its ambiguity leaves it open to interpretation, Cameron said.

In addition, the company is shifting customers to a Web-based transcription platform where they can check how the company arrived at its billing, Cameron said. The platform also will give customers "full visibility into the inner operation of the full dictation all the way to billing or transcription for every document," Cameron said.

One way physicians can sidestep the issue is to use electronic medical records software systems, which vendors and proponents of the technology say can eliminate transcription costs overnight.

But whether EMRs can be used to wipe out transcription costs depends on physicians stopping dictating cold turkey, experts said.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

An open book

In the transcription industry, billing can be opaque because companies define and count lines differently -- so transcriptionists and customers might not be using the same playbook. Because that makes it difficult for customers to audit their bills' accuracy, some companies are making billing more transparent. These steps include:

  • Offering clearer definitions of how they count a line.
  • Detailing the method they use to bill for their services.
  • Hiring independent third parties, such as accounting firms, to audit them.
  • Providing customers access to their books upon request.

Back to top


Transcription a la carte

Medical transcription companies use several billing methods. The per-line charge is the more dominant method, but others include charging per:

  • Page
  • Byte
  • Word
  • Report
  • Dictated minute
  • Visible black character

Back to top


External links

Statement of billing method principles issued by the Medical Transcription Industry Alliance in April 2003 (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn