Profession

No warrant, no searching doctors' offices, says Kentucky Supreme Court

The court rejected the state's argument that it was conducting a joint investigation with the medical board and that no warrant was needed.

By Amy Lynn Sorrel — Posted Jan. 15, 2007

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Just how far can criminal investigators go when they show up on a physician's doorstep to search his office?

Not one step further if they don't have a warrant, the Kentucky Supreme Court recently ruled. Nor can investigators enter under the auspices of the state medical board to avoid that requirement, the court said.

The state accused family physician Fortune J. Williams, MD, of overprescribing pain medications to patients seeking the drugs. A Lewis County jury in 2004 found him guilty and sentenced him to 20 years in prison. Dr. Williams has denied the allegations throughout the process.

Kentucky's high court in November 2006 overturned that conviction, finding that state investigators had violated Dr. Williams' constitutional rights when they invaded his clinic without a search warrant. The court ordered a new trial, where the evidence collected in the illegal search cannot be used.

At the time of the investigation, state law gave state medical board agents the authority to do administrative searches of doctors' offices at any time without a warrant or a subpoena and required doctors to produce patient files or evidence. But the statute didn't apply to law enforcement, the court noted.

"In plain words, neither [Kentucky's Constitution] nor the Fourth Amendment [of the U.S. Constitution] permits administrative statutes or agencies to be utilized or exploited as a means to conduct searches and seizures for law enforcement purposes without first obtaining consent or a valid warrant," the opinion states.

The Kentucky Attorney General and the Office of Drug Control Policy began their investigation of Dr. Williams in January 2001 and filed a grievance with the Kentucky Board of Medical Licensure that July.

The board asked state detectives to prepare a list of patient files they needed. In September 2001, state investigators, accompanied by a board inspector, entered Dr. Williams' clinic without a warrant, seizing patient files and other items.

Margaret F. Case, Dr. Williams' attorney, said authorities not only overstepped their bounds but also put patient privacy in jeopardy.

"They engaged the services of the medical board thinking they could hide behind the statute that allowed such broad powers," said Case, general counsel of the Kentucky Dept. of Public Advocacy.

"When law enforcement told the medical board what files to seek, they added some red herring names to the list to throw off people at the clinic, and some of the files seized were of patients who(m) there was no suspicion about at all," she added.

State officials declined to comment.

They argued in court papers that the warrantless search was valid because they were jointly investigating a complaint filed with the state medical board.

The Kentucky high court rejected those claims, saying the state was clearly doing a criminal investigation of its own that began six months before the medical board got involved.

Board General Counsel C. Lloyd Vest II said, "This particular case was a joint investigation, which is true of many prescribing cases. We're looking at the same activity but from different perspectives and different statutes."

In 2004, the board revoked Dr. Williams' license as a result of its own investigation, Vest said.

The board was not a party to the criminal case.

Because the court took up the constitutionality of the search, Vest said that legislators this year changed the board statute to require either consent or a warrant or subpoena before taking any records.

Physicians' rights

Legal experts say warrantless searches are rare. But at a time when the government is getting more aggressive in its investigations, attorneys say it is not uncommon for state regulators and law enforcement to collaborate in a search that can upset a doctor's practice.

"We often see these task forces that involve various agencies and prosecutors who rely heavily on the state's ability to come in often and at any time, and it's very disruptive," said W. Thomas Dillard, a criminal trial specialist with Tennessee-based Ritchie, Dillard & Davies PC.

"But at what point does it become unreasonable?" he asked.

Even what may seem like a routine visit from managed care auditors can prove troublesome, Dillard said.

Still, doctors are obligated to comply with law enforcement's legal requests, attorneys warn. But to protect their practices, doctors need to know who is knocking on their door.

"Then call a lawyer, because different standards apply in different investigations," said Virginia health law expert Julia Krebs-Markrich of Reed Smith.

A search warrant, which signals a criminal investigation, demands immediate response, she explained. But as the search begins, doctors still can take a moment to copy the document and contact legal counsel, or designate someone in the office to do so.

Doctors also can send nonessential employees home, because a warrant does not necessarily give investigators the right to interview people, she said.

Donna G. Klein, a Louisiana health lawyer with McGlinchey Stafford PLLC, also recommended that physicians "stay on top of what [investigators] are taking."

A subpoena generally will give doctors time to produce medical files, she said. But when facing a search warrant, Klein suggested that doctors get a copy of it and any accompanying list of documents investigators are seeking. Getting an inventory of what agents actually take and comparing the lists is also a good idea, as well as copying any original files investigators walk away with, she said.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Case at a glance

Fortune J. Williams, MD v. Commonwealth of Kentucky

Venue: Kentucky Supreme Court
At issue: Whether state criminal investigators could search a doctor's office without a warrant while conducting an investigation in conjunction with the state medical board. The court said no.
Potential impact: Attorneys say cases like this may be rare, but that government investigations are becoming more aggressive. The state said it was doing a joint investigation with the medical board, which had the authority, under state law, to search the doctor's clinic without a warrant.

Back to top


How to handle investigators

Here is what legal experts suggest physicians do if a state or federal investigator shows up at the office:

  • Consult legal counsel immediately.
  • Ask what agency the investigator is from and what type of information is requested.
  • Request a copy of the search warrant, subpoena, audit or other legal request, and any accompanying list of documents sought.
  • Send nonessential employees home.
  • Take an inventory of seized items and compare it with the document request.
  • Copy any original files that are seized.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn