Profession

AAP approves withdrawal of artificial nutrition from children in certain cases

Doctors are right to advise an end to feeding for pediatric patients in a persistent vegetative state and some other circumstances, the association says.

By Kevin B. O’Reilly — Posted Aug. 20, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

For nearly two decades, the medical and legal consensus has been that it is permissable to withdraw life-sustaining artificial hydration and nutrition from adult patients in a persistent vegetative state. But should that standard apply to children, too?

Yes, it should, but only if their parents agree, according to a new position statement issued by the American Academy of Pediatrics' Committee on Bioethics and published in the August Pediatrics (link).

There are as many as 35,000 pediatric patients living in a persistent vegetative state, according to the AAP report. The academy's statement says there are other "limited circumstances" under which it may be morally permissible for physicians to withdraw medically provided nutrition and fluids because those interventions can impose more burden than benefit to pediatric patients.

Cases where putting an end to feeding is ethically appropriate can include children with severe nervous system malformations or prenatal injury such as anencephaly, children with minimal consciousness, pediatric patients with terminal illnesses and infants with total intestinal failure.

The clinical difference between making this ethically difficult call in pediatric cases versus adult patients is that it is often harder to predict how children may fare neurologically, said Douglas S. Diekema, MD, MPH, lead author of the position statement. He said withdrawing artificial hydration and nutrition is especially sensitive when it comes to children.

"It feels different when it's a child who's your patient versus a 45-year-old," said Dr. Diekema, director of the Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics at Seattle Children's Hospital. "Also, there is a social significance to feeding in terms of parents taking care of their children, and that sometimes carries over to our thinking and to discussion of medically provided fluids and nutrition."

Even if a pediatric patient is in a persistent vegetative state, stopping feeding is not "morally required," the AAP says. Further, doctors and hospitals should not go against parents' wishes. But when there is disagreement among doctors and family, an ethics consultation should be arranged to help communicate with family and try to reach accord or refer the patient elsewhere, the academy said.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn