Government

System reform bill revisited by House panel that OK'd it

The Energy and Commerce Committee rejects physician balance billing, but adds hospital and health plan disclosure requirements.

By Doug Trapp — Posted Oct. 5, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

In a highly unusual move, the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Sept. 23 adopted 23 new amendments to a House health system reform bill that the panel already had approved two months earlier.

Committee Chair Henry Waxman (D, Calif.) had reached an agreement with panel Republicans on July 31, on the eve of the congressional August recess, to revisit several additional pending amendments later, instead of working late into the night.

Rep. Joe Barton (R, Texas), the highest-ranking GOP member on the committee, said during the Sept. 23 markup he could not recall another time in his 25 years in Congress that lawmakers amended a bill after it was adopted.

The panel adopted two packages of 22 amendments and one stand-alone change to the Affordable Health Choices Act. Barton said the packaged changes are noncontroversial and bipartisan. For example, they would allow the Dept. of Health and Human Services to provide grants for employer wellness programs. The committee also unanimously adopted a stand-alone amendment that would require hospitals and health plans to publicize price data.

Waxman said the amendments will be considered as recommendations to the House bill when the House Rules Committee begins combining his panel's bill with similar bills adopted by two other House committees. But the amendments would not have the same weight as the official language in the committee-approved bill, he said.

GOP attempts revisions

The Energy and Commerce Committee also rejected two Republican amendments. One would have allowed participating physicians to balance bill public insurance plan patients. Rep. Michael Burgess, MD (R, Texas), who sponsored the amendment, argued that the change was needed to ensure that patients would be able to see the physicians of their choice. Some doctors opt out of government plans because of relatively low pay. Balance billing also would prevent physicians from charging higher rates to private payers to make up for relatively low government rates, Dr. Burgess said.

But Rep. Frank Pallone (D, N.J.) noted that 47 states prohibit balance billing because it would expose consumers to unexpected charges and co-pays. "Providers shouldn't be charging patients more than the rates they agreed to when they agreed to participate in the plans' network," he said. Waxman added that the House bill would not require physicians to participate in the public plan.

The committee also voted down an amendment by Rep. Lee Terry (R, Neb.) that would have required a new federal commissioner in charge of determining minimum health benefits requirements to disclose all contacts with members of Congress, citizens and organizations. But Pallone worried that the amendment would discourage whistle-blowers and others from speaking to the commissioner because their visits would be part of the public record.

Republicans opened the late markup by arguing the Affordable Health Choices Act should be recalled and significantly amended in light of public comments made against the bill, known as HR 3200, at August town hall meetings.

"The world has changed since we last addressed HR 3200," said Rep. John Shimkus (R, Ill.). "The public has summarily rejected HR 3200 by their own research."

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Late changes to House health reform bill

In an usual additional markup, the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Sept. 23 finished amending a health system reform bill the panel had approved July 31. The House Rules Committee will consider the approved amendments when merging the three pending House bills.

Approved amendments

  • Would allow the Dept. of Health and Human Services to create infant mortality pilot programs, and award grants for integrated health care delivery programs and health science training programs; would provide grants for employer wellness programs; would create an Office of Women's Health at HHS and other agencies.
  • Would require HHS to ensure that 10% of all eligible health entities become test sites for an acute care bundling pilot program; would add child and adolescent health experts to a panel determining minimum health benefits requirements.
  • Would require insurers to disclose co-pays and other cost-sharing, and hospitals to disclose their charges compared with federal payment rates, plus other disclosures.

Rejected amendments

  • Would have allowed physician balance billing under the bill's public insurance plan.
  • Would have required the federal commissioner overseeing minimum health benefits requirements to disclose contacts with members of Congress and other organizations and individuals.

Source: House Energy and Commerce Committee, September (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn