opinion

What editorial writers are saying about ruling in Virginia's health reform lawsuit

A federal judge ruled that the individual insurance mandate in the health reform law is unconstitutional.

Posted Dec. 27, 2010.

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The Dec. 13 decision by U.S. District Court Judge Henry E. Hudson was the first against the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, although judges in two other cases came to the opposite conclusion.

ObamaCare loses in court

Liberals are attacking Judge Hudson because he was appointed by George W. Bush, but his ruling is relatively narrow. He didn't strike down the rest of ObamaCare even though it lacked a severability clause, and he didn't enjoin the law's implementation pending appeal. His opinion also doesn't touch Virginia Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli's long-shot claim that his state's "health freedom" law can nullify an act of Congress.

The Wall Street Journal, Dec. 14

Uncertain mandate on health care

Without the mandate, a lot of people will wait to buy coverage until they get sick, effectively allowing them to escape much of the burden of universal coverage while enjoying the benefits. The question will eventually have to be answered by the Supreme Court. If the court were to overturn this requirement, Congress and the president would have to look for other, less reliable ways to induce individuals to obtain health insurance, including more generous federal subsidies. Chicago Tribune, Dec. 13

Ruling on health law offers a victory for freeloaders

Troublingly for the judiciary, which is supposed to be politically independent, judges so far have divided along the same political lines Congress did when the law passed: Democratic-appointees for, Republican-appointees against. USA Today, Dec. 13

An unsettling second opinion on health care

The political nature of the court decisions suggests that Obama's achievement isn't yet down for the count -- it's just a matter of waiting for the right court and the right time, at least until the U.S. Supreme Court takes up the case. San Francisco Chronicle, Dec. 14

Congress needs to amend health care, not repeal

Hudson's argument is that the U.S. Constitution's Commerce Clause doesn't give Congress the authority to compel people to buy health insurance. But the way the law is actually written calls for a change in the Internal Revenue Service code, requiring Americans to pay a tax if they don't have health insurance from either a private or government source. Aurora (Colo.) Sentinel, Dec. 13

The latest health care decision

Judge Henry Hudson concluded that Congress can't regulate "economic inactivity," the failure to buy health insurance, as if it were "economic activity" that affected interstate commerce. Yet it seems clear that decisions not to buy insurance will, in the aggregate, affect costs in the broader health care markets. The New York Times, Dec. 13

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn