government

Minnesota high court to consider tobacco lawsuit

NEWS IN BRIEF — Posted April 11, 2011

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The Minnesota Supreme Court will review a lower court's decision reinstating a 10-year-old lawsuit against tobacco company giant Philip Morris.

The lawsuit originally was filed in 2001 by a group of consumers who claimed Philip Morris engaged in deceptive marketing when it advertised its low-tar cigarettes as safer than regular cigarettes. A trial judge dismissed the case in 2009, ruling the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue because they could not prove their cause of action benefited the public.

In December 2010, the Minnesota Court of Appeals reversed that decision, saying the suit was valid under the state's consumer-protection laws and could move forward. Philip Morris appealed to the state's Supreme Court.

In March, the high court agreed to examine the case. At this article's deadline, the court had not set a date for oral arguments.

Note: This item originally appeared at http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2011/04/11/gvbf0411.htm.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn