AMA House of Delegates

Action taken to reduce claim denial, allow audit equity

AMA policies seek to give physicians an equal footing with insurance companies regarding payment.

By Victoria Stagg Elliott — Posted Jan. 5, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Honolulu -- When Gregory Cooper, MD, a family physician in Cynthiana, Ky., writes a prescription for an antidepressant, the patient's insurance company may deny reimbursement. Although treatment of many forms of depression is widely considered to be well within the purview of primary care physicians, the insurer may refuse to pay the claim because Dr. Cooper is not a psychiatrist.

"I'm trained to treat depression, and it's a very common diagnosis in my practice," said Dr. Cooper, an AMA delegate.

This situation, where payment is denied solely because of a physician's specialty, is what the AMA wants to work toward eliminating, according to policy approved at the Association's Interim Meeting in December 2003.

The policy calls for the AMA to support "appropriate action" at the state and federal levels to ban such denials, while also actively discouraging insurance companies from continuing this practice.

"There are many things that do not need specialty care," said John C. Nelson, MD, MPH, AMA president-elect and an obstetrician-gynecologist from Salt Lake City. "For example, if a person came to me with a scar on her abdomen from a previous surgery, I have the ability to revise that scar, particularly if I'm doing another procedure. If that scar were on a person's face, I'm not going to touch that because that's a very technical area that needs to be dealt with correctly. I know my limits."

Many specialists supported the policy because it goes beyond finances and restricts access to care, especially when the required specialist may not be accessible or be in short supply.

"There are unfair restrictions that are not wise," said Michael Miller, MD, an addiction medicine specialist and a Wisconsin delegate. "In the area of addiction, there's no way the problem of alcoholism in this country is going to be treated only by addiction medicine specialists. There's not enough of us. There never will be. Primary care is where it's at, and for family physicians being unable to code for alcoholism in their practice is crazy."

The denials also add another layer of hassle for the patient.

Many physicians perceive these kinds of incidents as insurers trying to practice medicine.

"It's unfair to patients, and imposes an unnecessary hurdle," said Dr. Nelson. "We're the ones licensed to practice medicine, not the insurance company."

In addition to ending denial based on specialty, the AMA would also like insurers and physicians to have a more equal relationship.

Call for refunds

A separate policy adopted by the Association calls for legislation to instruct insurers to refund for undercoding or balance it against any overcoding discovered during the course of an audit.

Insurers during audits frequently demand money back if overcoding is discovered. However, undercoding rarely, if ever, results in additional payment or is even subtracted from the overcoding.

"I was talking to a professional coder, and she noted to me that many times the overcodes are more than balanced out by the undercodes," said Virginia Hall, MD, an obstetrician-gynecologist and a Pennsylvania delegate. "If we can ask insurers to refund what we did not code for properly, audits will not be an opportunity to pick the pockets of the physician."

According to the new policy, overcoding should be balanced with undercoding, and any excess caused by undercoding should be paid to the physician, just as overcoding results in payments to the insurer.

"Let's be fair," said Dr. Nelson. "The insurers have an amazing ability that if someone is deemed to have upcoded, the insurance companies are right there. What about the opposite side of that? Why shouldn't the doctor be able to get back what was withheld."

In other action, the AMA said physicians should avoid financial incentives that would result in inappropriate denial of care.

The Association also endorsed health reimbursement arrangements as a means to give patients greater control over their health care decision-making.

Currently, HRA accounts can be offered by any employer and consist of a "notional" account through which medical expenses are reimbursed. The AMA stated in a report that such accounts, however, should be improved and should be made real, owned by the employee rather than the employer, and rolled over from year to year. Such accounts also should be portable.

Back to top


Insurance-related action

  • The AMA will seek legislation requiring insurers to balance or refund for undercoding against any overcoding during the course of an audit.
  • The AMA will urge physicians to use the AMA Model Managed Care Contract and other resources to ensure that they are not unduly pressured by financial incentives to withhold appropriate care.
  • The AMA will support action to ban insurers from denying or reducing payment for services performed by physicians based solely on specialty.
  • The AMA endorsed Health Reimbursement Arrangements with employers.

Source: Proceedings of the AMA Interim meeting, December 2003

Back to top

External links

AMA Interim Meeting resolution on audit equity (link)

AMA Interim Meeting resolution on reimbursement denial based solely on specialty (link)

AMA Council on Medical Service's report on limiting financial incentives to withhold appropriate care (link)

AMA Council on Medical Service's report on health reimbursement arrangements (link)

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn