Profession

California damage cap protects medical groups, too

The appeals court based its ruling on case law on vicarious liability.

By Tanya Albert amednews correspondent — Posted Feb. 16, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

California's $250,000 cap on noneconomic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits got a big boost from a state appeals court in late January when it decided that the Medical Injury Compensation Reform Act applies to a medical group.

In the case on appeal, the plaintiff argued that a medical group should be held liable for more than the $250,000 cap.

But the California Court of Appeal for the First Appellate District Division Five ruled that if a patient tried to hold the physician partnerships liable for negligent acts of its licensed physician employees the cap as well as other MICRA provisions would apply.

The court reasoned that California case law establishes that an employer can't be held vicariously liable for compensatory damages that are greater than the amount for which the employee is held liable. "We see no reason why these settled principles on vicarious liability should not be applied," the court said in its opinion in Lathrop v. HealthCare Partners Medical Group. "HealthCare Partners cannot be held vicariously liable for noneconomic damages in excess of $250,000."

The ruling -- which could still be appealed -- overturns a San Francisco trial court decision that said that MICRA wasn't designed to protect physician partnerships. The latest ruling is a relief to California physician groups that provide care for nearly 80% of managed care enrollees in the state. The California Medical Assn. filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the case.

Physicians in other states have experienced rapidly rising liability rates and a shrinking pool of insurance carriers even as California physicians have enjoyed a relatively stable environment. Doctors believe the California cap put in place nearly three decades ago has been a way to keep medical liability insurance rates under control, and physicians around the country have tried to emulate the cap and other reforms in their own states and at the federal level.

Back to top


External links

California appellate decision in Lathrop v. HealthCare Partners Medical Group, in pdf (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn