Business

Measure performance of 401(k) funds against benchmarks

A column answering your questions about the business side of your practice

By Amy S. Born amednews correspondent— Posted March 15, 2004.

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Question I established a 401(k) plan for my medical practice a few years ago. The mutual funds that I selected to be included in the plan seemed to be good funds at the time; however, how do I know that still holds true today?

Answer: Given the volatility in the markets over the last few years, it can be challenging to assess the performance of any stock-based mutual fund investment. For example, even with the recent market rally, as of Dec. 31, 2003, the Standard & Poor's 500 Index produced a 4.05% annualized loss for the last three years. The technology-heavy Nasdaq Composite produced a 6.75% annualized loss for the same time period.

Therefore, when evaluating mutual fund investments, it is important to focus on relative performance. Ask yourself, how has the fund held up relative to an appropriate benchmark and other, similar funds?

Employers can monitor the plan's investments alone or with the assistance of an investment consultant. If you are planning on monitoring the investments yourself, here are some data points that warrant your review and assessment:

  • Look at the investment performance of each fund as it relates to an appropriate benchmark on at least a 1-, 3- and 5-year basis. For example, if the mutual fund was selected as a large-cap core fund, then its performance should be reviewed against the Standard & Poor's 500 index or the Russell 1000 index.
  • Compare the investment performance of each fund to its peers. Morningstar, which provides mutual fund analysis, categorizes mutual funds into different asset classes. Therefore, if a fund is considered to be a small-cap value fund, then its performance should be reviewed against other funds in its category. A good rule of thumb is to have funds in the top 33% of all funds on a 3- and 5-year basis. If rankings drop dramatically on a 1-year basis, the fund should be flagged for review but not necessarily removed. A greater emphasis should be placed on longer-term performance rather than shorter-term performance.
  • Monitor expense ratios. In general, the expense ratio of the fund should be equal to or less than the category average. Category averages can be found on Morningstar's Web site (link).
  • Check risk or standard deviation, a measure of volatility. It should be similar to that of an appropriate benchmark and/or the category average.

It is important to review these statistics on a periodic basis, but no less than annually. Also, consider developing criteria for removing a fund from your plan.

One example: Fund performance ranks in the bottom 50% of funds relative to peer rankings on a 3- and/or 5-year basis. Another example: Fund consistently underperforms appropriate benchmark for six out of the last eight quarters. Further, to better serve the participants in the plan, consider replacing funds that underperform rather than simply adding more choices to the plan investment lineup.

As a plan sponsor and fiduciary of the 401(k) plan, you play a critical role in the success of your defined contribution plan. Being proactive in your approach to monitoring the investments in the plan will ensure you are fulfilling your fiduciary duties as well as aid in developing a high-quality plan to assist your employees in achieving future financial independence.

To all those who responded, I appreciate the effort you took to express your views to me. This open exchange of ideas is an important part of what makes America so great.

Amy S. Born amednews correspondent—

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn