Government

Push continues for electronic health records

Bills set the foundation for action in the next Congress.

By Markian Hawryluk — Posted June 14, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Washington -- Another key senator has joined the ranks of influential lawmakers who have backed the notion of electronic health records.

Sen. Edward Kennedy (D, Mass.) introduced legislation in May that could foster the development of electronic records and provide financial incentives for their use.

Health care information technology is one of the few health issues on which Republicans and Democrats seem to agree, but continued wrangling over last year's Medicare Modernization Act and looming elections have cut that momentum to foundation-building for next year.

Kennedy's bill would require standards for interoperability of electronic health records to be finalized by Jan. 1, 2006, and would provide grants, loans and loan guarantees to help health care practitioners implement the technology. The legislation also would offer larger reimbursements to hospitals and other facilities that implement these types of information systems.

Under the measure, health care information technology would be used to improve quality of care by tracking performance on clinical measures and requiring both public and private payers to cut payments to practitioners who fail to meet quality standards.

"The legislation is an effective way to modernize and improve the health care system by using modern information technology, by paying for value and results and not simply for procedures performed or patients admitted to hospitals, and by focusing on improving quality and preventing disease," Kennedy said.

A Kennedy spokesman said the senator had not sought co-sponsors for the bill but introduced the legislation as a starting point. Kennedy is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. The panel's chair, Sen. Judd Gregg (R, N.H.), has introduced a bill that would implement President Bush's electronic health records plan, announced earlier this year. Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, N.Y.) and Reps. Nancy Johnson (R, Conn.) and Patrick Kennedy (D, R.I.) also have proposed health care IT bills.

Who will pay?

Physician groups, including the American Medical Association, have backed the drive for electronic health records, but they remain concerned about who would foot the bill for the new technology.

"We're not sure where the money is going to come from," said AMA Trustee Joseph M. Heyman, MD. "It may come from health insurers that may provide financial incentives to accomplish something like this. It may come from the government. We just aren't sure, and that's a big concern for us."

In his proposed fiscal 2005 budget, Bush asked for a doubling of the funds available for electronic records grants and demonstration projects to $100 million, an amount considered by experts as more a symbolic stake in the ground than adequate funding. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services also has issued a proposed rule that would provide an exemption to anti-kickback laws for hospitals and insurance companies to provide electronic record systems to physicians.

Private insurers are increasingly interested in the quality and efficiency gains that electronic systems can provide. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan recently implemented a records system in two of its regions and saw outpatient visits drop by 7%.

"That was a function of providers having the information at the time of the visit to adequately care for the patient, not having to have repeat visits, [and] being able to handle issues over the phone which prevented a visit," said Robert Crane, Kaiser senior vice president for research and policy development.

Crane said studies had shown that up to one-third of the time in inpatient settings and up to half the time in outpatient settings, physicians often do not have a paper record or test results at hand when they need to make an informed judgment about care.

"Our paper-based system is increasingly non-viable," he said. "[But] providers have been unwilling to make investments, not knowing that the infrastructure was solid, that standards are in place to allow this interoperability to take place."

Back to top


External links

Thomas, the federal legislative information service, for bill summary, status and full text of the Health Care Modernization, Cost Reduction and Quality Improvement Act (S 2421) (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn