Profession

Court tells New York to delete unfounded charges

Doctors should review information about them posted on a state Web site, an attorney recommends.

By Damon Adams — Posted July 26, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The New York Court of Appeals has ruled that it is wrong for the state to post unfounded misconduct charges against a physician on a public Web site.

The ruling stems from the case of a Manhattan general practice physician, who is anonymous in court records. He was cleared of most of the allegations brought against him by a female patient, but the state's health department posted the charges on a public-access Web site of physician information.

The state's highest court said unsubstantiated charges should not be posted publicly, and that doing so could hurt physicians.

"Many people who learn that a doctor has been charged with misconduct will think it possible that there was something to the charges, even if they were not upheld. Belief in that possibility will often be enough to make a prospective patient seek out another doctor," the court said in its June 29 ruling.

In 1999, the state's Board for Professional Medical Conduct charged the doctor with harassing and abusing a patient, failure to maintain records, moral unfitness, fraudulent practice and practicing beyond scope, according to court documents. The case involved a woman claiming to be a patient.

A hearing cleared the doctor of all but one charge, failure to maintain a medical record for a Cipro prescription, for which he received a reprimand. The state then posted the charges and outcome on the Internet. The doctor's attorney asked that the charges be removed, but the state said it was policy to post disciplinary orders.

The doctor sued. One lower court dismissed the doctor's petition, then another court said the health department must remove references of unproven charges. The New York Court of Appeals concluded that making the dismissed charges public "was an abuse of discretion."

Charles A. Singer, the doctor's attorney, said other New York doctors should check to see what information the state posts about them. "There may be a lot of doctors who are affected," he said.

The health department is reviewing its policies on public disclosure, said spokesman Joe DiMura.

Back to top


External links

New York's Office of Professional Medical Conduct (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn