Well-educated patients guide their own care

The big business of health care is generating an abundance of medical information that is welcomed by savvy patients.

By Susan J. Landers — Posted Sept. 20, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Washington -- The Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center at the National Institutes of Health, due to open this winter, is vastly different from the adjacent 51-year-old NIH clinical center. So are the new brand of patients it will house.

For one thing, most are no longer referred by physicians, and many say they don't even have a regular doctor.

They are part of a patient group that appears to be assuming control of their own health care. They are well-educated, extremely computer literate and also happen to have a disease or condition the NIH is interested in treating.

"Ten years ago, 100% of the patients were referred by physicians; it was required," said John Gallin, MD, director of the NIH Clinical Center and associate director for clinical research. "The way we got patients is we would send out booklets to most physicians in the country outlining protocols. And they would refer patients."

Now, about 62% of patients are self-referred and, of necessity, the physician-referral rule was eliminated.

In another change over the past decade, the patients no longer seem to consider themselves under the care of a specific doctor. "My impression is that almost every patient had a physician 10 years ago. But now, 35% of patients who walk through the door say they have no physician," Dr. Gallin said.

Managed care has triggered that change, he said. Instead of a physician's name, patients are likely to identify Blue Cross Blue Shield or CIGNA as their health care provider, he added. "My sense is that the statement that patients don't know who their physicians are goes way beyond NIH and is a true statement for the country."

Since all NIH patients need an overseeing physician, social workers soon connect patients with a doctor to call their own, Dr. Gallin said. And he would prefer that patients arrive knowing their physician's name. Still, he says the self-referred patient has certain positive attributes -- for instance, they tend to be well-informed. "The more informed the patients are, the better."

An abundance of information

Medicine and biotechnology are big businesses now, and new findings are thoroughly explored in newspapers, magazines and books.

"Health is everywhere," said Kay Dickersin, PhD, director of the Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence-based Healthcare at Brown University in Providence, R.I. "It's in books, on TV, there are stories on diet, exercise, heart health and cholesterol." It is also a topic of Internet searches.

"Ten years ago, not everyone had access to a computer at home. Now, many people have home and work access, and there is more than one computer in the family," Dr. Dickersin said.

But the spread of computers might have bypassed poorer people, thus increasing the possibility that a two-class society is being created, Dr. Gallin said. "I think we all worry about that a lot," he said, although public libraries' offerings of computer access could counter some of this.

Mary Woolley, head of Research! America, a nonprofit health research advocacy organization, sees a trend toward more patient self-referral to all research studies, not just those at the NIH clinical center. "While just 10% of the population is accessing clinical trial Web sites, 10% is a lot of people," she said. "And I think we are just seeing the beginning."

"Patients want to be engaged not just as a patient but as a partner and ultimately as the boss of their health care. That's a real change in their relationship with their physicians."

Not only is information more accessible, but physicians and their patients often hear about the latest health care advances simultaneously. "A generation ago, people might not have ever seen the information, or they may have seen it filtered through several layers, including medical journals and their own physicians," Woolley said.

The research enterprise is also several times larger than it was 10 years ago, both in the private and public sectors. "There are more hands at the wheel doing research and generating more output," she noted.

Back to top


Blending patient care and research needs

Next December, the patients in residence at the old National Institutes of Health clinical center will move to the new Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Center, a building that their ideas have helped shape.

There will be meals on demand -- no longer will a CT scan mean a missed meal or cold plate. Bathrooms are outfitted with adjustable showers that allow a good wash without interfering with the patient's IV. Speed bumps were eliminated from the parking garage because the extra jounce right after chemotherapy caused vomiting.

There are also lots of windows and natural light in the 242-bed, low-rise facility with views of trees, grass and a display of medicinal plants from the National Arboretum.

But the new center is more than just another pretty hospital. It bristles with state-of-the-art lab equipment and is intended to strengthen the link between laboratory findings and their practical application for detecting and treating disease and disability.

The NIH tackles tough medical problems. "If you can do it everywhere, we don't do it here," said Steven A. Rosenberg, MD, PhD, chief of surgery at the National Cancer Institute. "NIH is an incubator for risky, difficult research areas." Each patient has his or her own protocol.

The building's infrastructure includes a ventilation system that directs air through the building without recirculating it to minimize the spread of allergens and pathogens. It also contains a transport system for vials of blood and other fluids.

The new facility is named for retired former Oregon Republican Sen. Mark Hatfield, who supported funding for NIH in his years as chair of the Appropriations Committee. It takes over some of the functions of the 50-year-old Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center, named for the late Democratic senator from Washington who also chaired the Appropriations Committee during his congressional tenure.

Back to top

External links

Information on the Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center at the National Institutes of Health (link)

Center for Clinical Trials and Evidence-based Healthcare at Brown University (link)

Research!America, an advocacy group for health research (link)

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn