government

Medicare doctor payments contribute to Part B premium rise

Physician reimbursement accounts for a third of the increase, and it could become a target for political battle.

By Joel B. Finkelstein — Posted Sept. 27, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Washington -- The steep rise in next year's Medicare Part B premiums can be tied in part to increased spending on physician services, but it is unclear whether that will factor into future efforts to shore up doctors' reimbursement rates.

Under the Medicare payment formula, physicians' reimbursement was set to sustain large cuts this year and next. But last year Congress passed a measure mandating that rates increase no less than 1.5% through 2005.

"Without Congress' intervention to stop the scheduled cuts in physician payments, Medicare patients' access to physician services would have been in jeopardy," said John C. Nelson, MD, MPH, president of the American Medical Association.

In part due to the increase in doctors' payments and a rise in the volume of physician services, beneficiaries will pay 17.5% more a month for their Part B premiums, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced recently. Monthly premiums will be $78.20 next year. The agency uses a formula to calculate premiums as a portion of total Medicare costs.

Physician payments are only one factor of many that are behind the rise in beneficiaries' premiums, said Robert Doherty, senior vice president of governmental affairs and public policy at the American College of Physicians.

An AMA analysis found that together, higher payments to Medicare managed care plans, new preventive benefits and increased spending in Part B services account for about a third of the increased premiums. The need to boost cash reserves in the Part B account of the Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund is responsible for another third, and physician payments account for about a third.

The 1.5% increase physicians received does not even keep up with practice costs, Dr. Nelson said. In addition, doctors face reimbursement cuts in 2006 and beyond if the Medicare payment formula is not changed.

In announcing the premium increase, CMS officials argued that beneficiaries are paying more for Medicare but also getting more from the program.

"The new premiums reflect an enhanced Medicare that is providing seniors and people with disabilities with strengthened access to physician services and new preventive benefits," said CMS Administrator Mark B. McClellan, MD, PhD, in a statement.

Political scrutiny ahead?

Although it is not yet clear whether physician payments will be subject to budget cutting by Congress, as Medicare spending continues to rise dramatically the possibility that those payments will come under political scrutiny will grow, said Brett Baker, senior associate of regulatory affairs at the ACP.

A new Congressional Budget Office report estimates that Medicare outlays will have grown by 8.1% in 2004 and by a total of 30.6% between 2005 and 2007. Federal Reserve Board Chair Alan Greenspan recently said that those growth rates mean Congress will have little choice but to make cuts to the program in the near future.

Meanwhile, Democrats are making the Medicare premium increase a political issue. In response to the CMS announcement, leading Senate Democrats introduced a bill that would cap premium increases, which Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D, Mich.) said hurt low-income seniors the most.

"Why are senior citizens getting socked?" asked Sen. Edward Kennedy (D, Mass.), who has co-sponsored the bill. "Because President Bush has done nothing to control soaring health care costs and because he values high profits for HMOs and drug companies more than he values senior citizens."

The Democrats also targeted the Medicare reform law as a major contributor to the premium increase.

The proposed premium cap smacks of election-year politics, as the bill has little chance of moving this year because Congress is busy playing catch-up with spending bills, said ACP's Doherty.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn