Business

Scrushy on trial: He's sure he'll win

HealthSouth's charismatic founder is approaching his upcoming court date on fraud charges in his customary manner -- with great self-assurance.

By Katherine Vogt — Posted Dec. 27, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Richard M. Scrushy's career is defined by boldness and extreme confidence. After all, the former respiratory therapist started HealthSouth in 1984 -- mostly with his money -- to revolutionize physical therapy by taking it out of hospital basements and small facilities.

Scrushy was successful in a short time -- he took HealthSouth public in 1986, and a few years later, thanks to aggressive acquisition and marketing strategies, the company was the nation's largest outpatient services company.

But now Scrushy is awaiting federal trial on charges related to a massive accounting scandal at HealthSouth, which fired him as CEO once the scandal came to light. And true to his style, he's facing it with boldness and confidence -- he's sure he'll be found innocent, and that he might even be able to work for HealthSouth again.

"Absolutely we believe that we will be fully acquitted. We're innocent of these charges," Scrushy said in an interview in early December. "We're looking forward to our day in court to put this behind us and let us go back to having a normal life. My family has been wrongly burdened with this. It's been a lot of pain and anguish."

Jury selection in Scrushy's trial is scheduled to begin Jan. 5, 2005, in U.S. District Court in Birmingham, Ala., HealthSouth's home base.

Prosecutors are expected to contend that Scrushy was the ringleader of the accounting scheme. They say he threatened and intimidated other HealthSouth executives to go along with the scheme while he personally reaped more than $278 million in "ill-gotten gains" to furnish a lavish lifestyle in which he bought expensive cars, jewelry, art, boats and even an airplane.

But Scrushy's attorneys are expected to contend that he was oblivious to the fraud that was happening around him -- that it was so well hidden in a complicated web of accounting tricks that he should not be held responsible for it.

Scrushy declined to discuss specifics about the case, and his attorney, Donald Watkins, and the lead prosecutor, U.S. Attorney Alice Martin, declined to comment on the trial, citing a gag order.

But observers say Scrushy, fired as HealthSouth CEO in the wake of the scandal, faces an uphill battle. Seventeen other former HealthSouth executives -- including all five chief financial officers -- have pleaded guilty to charges in an alleged plot to inflate the company's earnings by $2.6 billion between 1996 and 2003, in order to boost the company's stock price. All are believed to be cooperating with prosecutors and could testify against Scrushy.

Observers say his attorneys will have to work hard to discredit those witnesses as well as any paper trail that leads to Scrushy.

They expect the trial to be closely watched not only because of Scrushy's larger-than-life persona but also because his case is thought to be the first court test of a relatively new law that holds corporate executives accountable for their company's financial statements.

If convicted of all the charges against him, which include 58 counts ranging from conspiracy and fraud to obstruction of justice and money laundering, Scrushy could face up to 450 years in prison and more than $30 million in fines, as well as being ordered to forfeit ill-gotten gains.

To Scrushy, the only possible outcome is exoneration. He said there is no way he would cut a deal with prosecutors to avoid a trial.

"We want our name fully cleared. There is no settlement. We didn't do these things," he said. "I do not want to be associated with this crime and should not be."

The Scrushy name

For Scrushy, the trial is literally about saving his good name. Thanks to generous charitable and corporate giving, it's all over Birmingham, from the Vestavia Hills Richard M. Scrushy Library to the Jefferson State Community College Richard M. Scrushy Campus. He said regaining a good reputation at home could be difficult, but, of course, he believes it will be done.

"I don't know where you go to get your name back after you've been so brutally attacked by so many people," he said "[But] we believe that people just as quickly as they attack you, they will forgive. Once the truth comes out, I think they can very quickly turn the other way.

"I think there will be a lot of sympathy. People will say that's horrible and that could happen to me."

If given the chance, Scrushy would like to return to HealthSouth, which he said was like his child. He was fired from the company a few weeks after the accounting scandal surfaced in March 2003.

At that time, HealthSouth's stock was pulled from the New York Stock Exchange. It re-emerged on the penny-stock, over-the-counter "pink sheets," trading for a dime a share. However, the company is back up to more than $5 a share.

Scrushy said HealthSouth's ability to weather this scandal -- it continues to operate and narrowly averted bankruptcy -- proves how sound the business is.

"We worked so hard for 20 years to build this great company, and a lot of sweat and blood and muscle and passion was in that," he said. "I was wrongly terminated. I was totally wrongly put out. So I think the right thing to do would be to correct what the wrong was. I'm very much looking forward to an acquittal so I have the right to go back to HealthSouth."

But observers see little chance of that happening. Attorneys who have been following the case say the evidence against him is daunting.

"I think they're going to get him," said Joe Casson, a health law attorney with Proskauer Rose, LLP, in Washington, DC. "I think there's enough here for the government to make out the case they'll have to make out."

Casson said the witness testimony against Scrushy could be the most damaging. Indeed, the indictment alleges that Scrushy had meetings with co-conspirators in which they discussed the phony accounting, and that once he even allegedly offered to "take care of" a co-conspirator's family if that person would take the blame for the overstatements.

Casson said the meetings were so common they were called "family meetings."

He said the conspirators also spent a lot of time creating a "fake audit trail" to cover up the fraud, which could give prosecutors a bounty of information to use at trial.

But Casson said the prosecution might have a more difficult time demonstrating to a jury exactly how the alleged accounting fraud was perpetrated because it involved complex accounting principles.

"It's a difficult thing to explain to a jury," he said, adding later that the defense could benefit from trying "to complicate the accounting" to make it less clear that Scrushy was connected to it.

Casson also expects the defense to try to diminish the credibility of the witnesses that the government uses by showing that many of them cut "sweetheart" deals to get light sentences with little or no prison time in exchange for their cooperation.

The trial is believed to be the first test of a law known as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which requires chief executives to certify their company's financial statements, asserting that the statements are true to the best of their knowledge. The indictment alleges that Scrushy knowingly signed off on false financial statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in violation of this law.

Casson said Scrushy's lawyers might feel confident that they can take on Sarbanes-Oxley, even though they were denied a motion challenging its constitutionality in a Nov. 23 ruling from U.S. District Judge Karon Bowdre. "It may be that they think they can attack Sarbanes-Oxley on grounds that it inherently invokes self-incrimination," he said.

Don Cochran, a professor at Samford University's Cumberland School of Law in Birmingham and a former prosecutor, said the trial could raise some difficult questions about the parameters of the Sarbanes-Oxley law.

"If his defense is, as it seems to be, that he was misled by subordinates, is he responsible just for signing the form? That will be another interesting question that the court will have to address," he said.

Cochran said Scrushy's fame could make it difficult to find an impartial jury.

"Everything he did was big. His houses were big, he lived a lavish lifestyle and even when he would give money -- and he gave a lot of money to the community, and he always attached his name to it -- even his charity was done in a big sort of way. So it probably wouldn't be surprising that his downfall was in a big sort of way," Cochran said.

Critics questioned if Scrushy was attempting to win over potential jurors when he and his wife, Leslie, began hosting a TV talk show in March on a Birmingham station. The show, "Viewpoint," features a short devotional reflecting the Scrushys' faith and discussion with guests from the community. But Scrushy's representatives insisted nothing about the case would be discussed on the show.

The show is just one example of how Scrushy has continued to lead a public life in the wake of the scandal. He also launched a Web site (link) on which he has posted letters of encouragement, rebuttals to news stories and legal filings.

Scrushy said he feels like prosecutors are trying to make an example of him, perhaps because of his fame.

"I think it was necessary politically to have some poster boy, and there's no doubt that I was a big target," he said. "When you build a company as large as I did, you're a good target to be a poster boy."

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Scrushy in trouble

Key events in the fraud investigation of former HealthSouth CEO Richard M. Scrushy include:

March 2003: The Securities and Exchange Commission files a civil fraud complaint against Scrushy and HealthSouth alleging they overstated earnings by at least $1.4 billion. Prosecutors announce that three former financial officers have been charged with fraud and an investigation of HealthSouth is ongoing. Scrushy takes administrative leave from the company to organize his legal team. A few weeks later, the board of directors fires him.

April 2003: The House Energy and Commerce Committee opens an investigation into HealthSouth's accounting irregularities.

July 2003: The tally has reached at least 11 executives, including all five former chief financial officers, who have agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges in the investigation. The company has $3.3 billion in debt and allegations have been expanded to say earnings were overstated by at least $2.6 billion. HealthSouth says it is hopeful it can avoid bankruptcy.

October 2003: Scrushy refuses to testify about the alleged fraud before congressional investigators, invoking his rights under the Fifth Amendment. At least 15 former executives have agreed to plead guilty to criminal charges in the probe.

November 2003: Scrushy is indicted on 85 counts of fraud, conspiracy and other charges. He surrenders to authorities, pleads innocent and is released on $10 million bond.

December 2003: The first sentences are handed down against former HealthSouth executives. Four are ordered to serve probation and one is sentenced to five months in prison.

March 2004: Scrushy and his wife begin hosting a TV talk show on a cable station in Birmingham. Critics complain he is trying to influence potential jurors.

July 2004: By now, 19 former HealthSouth executives have faced criminal charges. As of early December, 17 had pleaded guilty.

August 2004: U.S. District Judge Karon O. Bowdre reschedules Scrushy's fraud trial to begin on Jan. 5, 2005.

September 2004: A grand jury returns a revised 58-count indictment against Scrushy, consolidating some of the previous charges and adding new ones, including perjury and obstruction of justice. At an arraignment hearing to answer the revised charges, Scrushy tells the judge he is "absolutely not guilty."

January 2005: Jury selection to begin in U.S. District Court, Birmingham, Ala.

Sources: U.S. Attorney's Office, Securities and Exchange Commission, House Energy and Commerce Committee, Richard Scrushy's personal Web site and AMNews archives

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn