Health

Chest CT scans detect early-stage lung cancer

Researchers say it is time to consider regular screening. Other scientists are investigating breast cancer tests and whether virtual colonoscopy can reveal heart attack risk.

By Victoria Stagg Elliott — Posted Dec. 27, 2004

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Annual computed tomography screening of the chest makes it more likely that, if a lung cancer is detected, it is at stage I when it is most curable, according to a paper presented at the Radiological Society of North America meeting in Chicago last month.

Researchers from the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program analyzed data collected from more than 26,000 people who, since 1993, have received CT scanning in conjunction with this study. The project is a collaboration of scientists around the world who are investigating ways to improve this cancer's cure rate.

Screening led to the diagnosis of more than 300 cancers with 82% at stage I. On the basis of these data, the paper's authors are recommending that those at high risk, such as smokers, consider annual screening.

"We feel you should individualize this decision," said Claudia I. Henschke, MD, PhD, principal investigator and professor of radiology at Cornell Medical Center in New York. "And then it's up to you if you want to pay that money to be screened."

Other experts said, though, that while the numbers were interesting, they were still not conclusive enough to change recommendations -- most of which are lukewarm on lung cancer screening.

Medical societies recommend that patients only undergo such tests within the context of a clinical trial.

In May, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force issued a statement acknowledging that there were fair data that screening detected these cancers early, but poor data that it had any impact on mortality. Thus, the task force's expert panel said there was insufficient evidence to recommend either for or against the strategy.

"If you want to get into a trial, that's fine," said Edward F. Patz Jr., MD, professor of radiology, pharmacology and cancer biology at Duke University in Durham, N.C. "But right now there are no data that suggest screening will actually reduce mortality." Dr. Patz is involved in the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial, which is also investigating this question.

Other developments

While some researchers are looking for ways to screen for lung cancer, others are seeking ways to improve mammography, particularly for women at high risk for breast cancer.

These cancers, which are mostly in young women, are more likely to be missed by mammography. A study presented at the meeting by the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium Trial suggested that magnetic resonance imaging can identify these tumors.

"MR findings resulted in 6% of women with a negative mammogram and a negative clinical breast exam being recommended for biopsy," said Constance Dobbins Lehman, MD, PhD, lead author and director of breast imaging at the University of Washington Medical Center in Seattle. "Three additional cancers were detected in those women."

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has no policy on this issue, although the American Cancer Society says that additional tests such as MRI should be considered by women at high risk.

But cancer may not be the only medical condition that these screening tests can identify. According to another study presented at RSNA by researchers at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla., virtual colonoscopy may detect heart attack risk.

Researchers reviewed the records of nearly 500 patients who had the procedure at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minn., and gathered information about calcification in the abdominal aorta. Their findings: The higher the score, the more likely the patient was to have a cardiac event. Additionally, this score correlated well with other known risk factors such as hypertension.

"This early study points to the possibility of multiple diagnostic benefits for patients participating in certain colon cancer screenings," said lead author, Jesse A. Davila, MD, a fellow in musculoskeletal radiology at the Jacksonville Mayo Clinic.

The USPSTF recommends that those older than 50 be screened for colon cancer but says there are insufficient data to recommend virtual screening.

An American Gastroenterological Assn. expert panel concluded this month that this method had significant promise but that the technology is still evolving.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Looking for lung cancer

Objective: International Early Lung Cancer Action Project investigators at 33 institutions around the world studying CT screening to evaluate its usefulness in detecting the disease among smokers.

Methods: Baseline screening was performed on more than 26,000 patients with more than 19,000 undergoing follow-up testing annually.

Results: About 15% tested positive for lung cancer during the baseline test and another 6% tested positive in subsequent screenings. Of the 376 cancers detected, a significant majority were at stage I, and 303 were resected. The eight-year mortality rate after surgery was 4%.

Conclusions: Annual CT screening detects a significant number of stage I lung cancers, and mortality is very low after resection.

Source: Presentation at the Radiological Society of North America annual meeting, Chicago, Nov. 28-Dec. 3.

Back to top


External links

"International Early Lung Cancer Action Project (I-ELCAP): Evaluation of Low-dose CT Screening," abstract presented at the Radiological Society of North America's annual meeting in Chicago, Nov. 28-Dec. 3 (link)

"The Added Cancer Yield of MRI in Screening Women at High Risk for Breast Cancer: Results of the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) Trial," abstract presented at the Radiological Society of North America's annual meeting in Chicago, Nov. 28-Dec. 3 (link)

"Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk Status at CT Colonography," abstract presented at the Radiological Society of North America's annual meeting in Chicago, Nov. 28-Dec. 3 (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn