Profession

DEA: Separate registration for multistate practices

Physicians have until Feb. 7 to comment on the agency's proposed rule.

By Andis Robeznieks — Posted Jan. 17, 2005

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Physicians who prescribe controlled substances and practice in more than one state soon could have more fees to pay, more paperwork to fill out and more numbers to identify themselves by.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration wants these physicians to obtain separate DEA controlled substance prescribing registration for each state in which they practice, according to an item posted in the Federal Register on Dec. 7, 2004. Although the amendment is supposed to clarify existing regulations, one physician who practices in western Kentucky and southern Illinois said it would cause only headaches and confusion.

"It is definitely not the greatest thing in the world, and I don't see how it will have any advantage at all," said Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD, medical director of the Pain Management Center of Paducah and the Ambulatory Surgery Center of Paducah in Kentucky. "I don't know why the DEA is so worried about this. It should keep the system the way it is."

It is very common for Kentucky physicians in Paducah or Louisville to also practice in Ohio, Indiana or Illinois, said Dr. Manchikanti, who is president of the American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians. He estimated that about 20% of the society's 3,000 members practice in more than one state.

Dr. Manchikanti said this was not just a concern for pain specialists. He said the change also would affect primary care physicians, psychiatrists and pediatricians.

The Federal Register stated that the DEA would take public comments on the proposed rule change until Feb. 7. There were no other dates or schedule information given related to the proposal. "The process will take whatever time is required," said DEA spokeswoman Rogene Waite. "DEA does not impose timelines."

The AMA said it was reviewing the proposal and, although it did not have an official comment at this time, it did plan on submitting comments before the Feb. 7 deadline.

Jeff Gilbert, spokesman for the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America industry group, said his organization also was reviewing the proposal but had no comment at this time.

Money is not the issue

On Dec. 1, 2003, the DEA raised its registration fee for physicians from $70 to $131, but Dr. Manchikanti said his problem with the proposal was not the money. He said it's the registration process, which can take two weeks or more. He also predicted problems such as physicians accidentally writing the wrong registration number or patients receiving unwarranted law enforcement scrutiny because they received a prescription in one state and filled it in another.

The DEA's Federal Register posting stated that each DEA registration was always intended to be applied only for offices within one state and that the proposal was being made in order to avoid "further misinterpretation."

"DEA proposes to amend its regulations to make it clear that when an individual practitioner who practices and is registered in one state and seeks to practice and prescribe controlled substances in another state, he/she must obtain a separate DEA registration for the subsequent state," the Federal Register stated.

In explaining the need for separate registrations, the DEA noted that registration serves to reflect that a certain state has granted a doctor "some level of controlled substance authority" and that registration is considered to be "related directly and exclusively" to an individual state license.

In explaining the need for maintaining this direct relationship, the DEA noted that state prescribing laws can differ.

Scott Fishman, MD, chief of the Division of Pain Medicine and associate professor of anesthesiology at the University of California, Davis, and president-elect of the American Academy of Pain Medicine, said the proposal "sounds like it's reasonable" on its surface, but he questioned the DEA's motives and intentions in light of a recent deterioration in the agency's relationship with physicians.

Back to top


External links

"Clarification of Registration Requirements for Individual Practitioners," Federal Register, Dec. 7, 2004 (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn