Supreme Court refuses to hear Schiavo case

Debate over a brain-damaged Florida woman shows the need for stating end-of-life care wishes.

By Andis Robeznieks — Posted Feb. 7, 2005

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

By refusing to hear the case of Jeb Bush v. Michael Schiavo, the U.S. Supreme Court may have ended a long legal battle that is believed to have sparked public interest in living wills and advance directives.

The court's Jan. 24 decision upheld the Florida Supreme Court's Sept. 3, 2004, ruling overturning a state law that gave Gov. Jeb Bush specific authority to reinsert the feeding tube for Terri Schiavo, a Florida woman who has been in a persistent vegetative state for 15 years.

The court's decision appears to end the dispute between Schiavo's husband, who argued that she would not want to continue living in her current state, and her parents, who say she is mentally aware. Unable to swallow, Schiavo receives nutrition and water through a tube. In 2001 and 2003, courts allowed Michael Schiavo to discontinue feedings for his wife, only to have others order them reinstated.

Terri Schiavo's parents have other appeals, but a Supreme Court ruling was believed to be their best chance at keeping their daughter's tube in place. It was not immediately known if or when the tube would be removed.

Diane Coleman, president of Not Dead Yet, a national disability rights group based in suburban Chicago, said there is still hope Schiavo's parents will somehow attain custody. She said California's 1990 "Richard S" case established the principle that custody of impaired individuals should go to the party willing to commit to that individual's care.

Both the Florida Medical Assn. and the AMA have remained neutral on the Schiavo case.

"That really is the principle that we think the Florida court should be going on," Coleman said.

Because of the way the case wound through Florida's judicial, legislative and executive branches before ending in the U.S. Supreme Court, Arthur R. Derse, MD, said it offers "a lesson more in civics than medical ethics."

"Most end-of-life cases end with families and physicians on the same page," said Dr. Derse of the Medical College of Wisconsin in Milwaukee's Center for the Study of Bioethics. "This a testimonial that the best way to resolve these issues is by making your wishes known."

Terri Schiavo had no advance directive.

Back to top

External links

Florida Supreme Court documents in the Schiavo court cases (link)

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn