Profession

Nonphysicians eager to pick up prescription pad

Empowered by recent victories, nonphysicians gear up for 2005 legislative efforts to expand their scope.

By Myrle Croasdale — Posted Feb. 7, 2005

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Nonphysicians such as naturopaths and psychologists, having seen their colleagues in other states win the right to prescribe or otherwise expand their scope of practice, are expected to push hard for the same authority in more states in 2005. Meanwhile, organized medicine is getting ready to fight their efforts.

According to the American Psychological Assn., psychologists in Hawaii, Wyoming and Tennessee are talking to their legislators about introducing bills that would expand their prescription authority, and psychologists are expected to do likewise in another three to six states this year.

The American Assn. of Naturopathic Physicians says at least 11 states will see licensing campaigns by its constituents in 2005.

Practitioners from podiatrists to nurse anesthetists to optometrists are also planning to seek to expand their scope of practice to include tasks normally performed only by physicians.

Russ Newman, PhD, executive director for professional practice at the American Psychological Assn, said psychologists want to prescribe because otherwise, many people would not get the mental care they need.

"The access issue is not uniquely a rural issue," Dr. Newman said. "Access issues also take place in urban areas, as evidenced by waiting times to see psychiatrists. ... When people run into obstacles to accessing care, often they decide to not continue to seek care and never get any."

Steven Sharfstein, MD, president-elect of the American Psychiatric Assn., said such arguments don't adequately address patient safety. His group opposed legislation in New Mexico and Louisiana allowing psychologists to prescribe psychotropic medications and is fighting a bill in New Mexico to expand their prescription formulary to include off-label drugs.

"Prescribing [psychotropic] medication is very complicated," said Dr. Sharfstein, a Baltimore psychiatrist. "As physicians, we know what our limits are. We know when we need to ask for help."

Organized medicine is gearing up to help physicians protect patients and keep medicine within the ranks of those trained to practice it.

John C. Nelson, MD, MPH, president of the American Medical Association, said the organization's prime concern is patient safety.

"A person who is not a physician ought to be able to practice within their training," Dr. Nelson said. "If they want to increase their scope, they should do it through education, not legislation."

The AMA's newly formed scope-of-practice advisory committee, made up of representatives from state medical and specialty societies, is considering ways to bolster physician resources, including the possibility of establishing a resource center on scope-of-practice issues. Activities of such a center might include researching rural health and seeing whether access actually improves when nonphysicians gain prescribing rights.

The Federation of State Medical Boards also has stepped into the fray. James N. Thompson, MD, president and CEO of the federation, said its special committee on scope of practice had drafted a list of guidelines to enable legislators to make educated decisions on scope-of-practice bills. The proposed guidelines will go before FSMB delegates in May.

Why scope is expanding

One of the forces propelling nonphysicians is deepening public acceptance of their trade. According to the latest Institute of Medicine report, "Complementary and Alternative Medicine by the American Public," one-third of U.S. adults use some form of alternative medicine, such as herbal remedies, acupuncture and naturopathy. Total visits to these practitioners now exceed those to primary care physicians on an annual basis, and these patients spend more than $27 billion a year out of their own pockets for this care.

In California, the 13th state to license naturopaths, such acceptance underpinned naturopaths' efforts to gain prescribing rights. While they may prescribe medication only under physician supervision, they may order diagnostic tests and prescribe and administer herbs, vitamins and mineral supplements.

California issued its first batch of naturopathic doctor licenses in January, and by January 2006, it should finalize the formulary NDs may prescribe under physician supervision.

Because California is considered a bellwether for health care trends, the American Assn. of Naturopathic Physicians hopes to duplicate what it achieved in California, particularly winning enough prescribing authority for NDs to be considered front-line health care practitioners.

Tara Levy, ND, one of the state's first licensed naturopaths and president of the California Naturopathic Doctors Assn., is looking forward to the added freedom to order her own diagnostic tests and do a limited amount of prescribing.

"This will change my role as a doctor for some of my patients," she said. "I feel like I've been operating with one hand behind my back until now."

The success of such nonphysicians reflects growing demand for health care that focuses on wellness, rather than only traditional therapies, she said, and physicians should see this as an opportunity, not a threat.

While naturopaths in California are marching along in their licensing process, so are psychologists in Louisiana and New Mexico, the only two states that allow psychologists to prescribe psychotropic drugs. Both recently finalized regulations outlining their licensing processes. But it took New Mexico three years to complete these regulations, while Louisiana did it in less than a year. In part this was because New Mexico required its Board of Medical Examiners and the Board of Psychologist Examiners to work together to develop its regulations.

Louisiana, in contrast, permitted the state's psychologists to develop the prescription licensing regulations without physician input.

Jack Lewin, MD, CEO of the California Medical Assn., which opposed licensing NDs, said physicians facing similar legislative efforts should approach them without being defensive.

"The plain and simple fact is that most patients, once they become fully aware of the difference between a physician and a naturopath, will ultimately choose physician care for most of their needs," he said.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Naturopaths gain ground

There are 13 states that license naturopaths, as do the District of Columbia and the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands. According to the American Assn. of Naturopathic Physicians, this year naturopaths are seeking to expand their scope of practice in at least two of these states. They are also pursuing licensing in at least another 11 states.

Naturopaths are licensed: Alaska, Arizona, California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Kansas, Maine, Montana, New Hampshire, Oregon, Utah, Vermont, Washington, U.S. territories: Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands

Naturopaths are seeking licensure: Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Massachusetts, Missouri, North Carolina, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania

Naturopaths are seeking to expand their scope of practice: Alaska, Washington

Sources: Institute of Medicine, American Assn. of Naturopathic Physicians, Health Policy Tracking Service

Back to top


Physicians push back

The Federation of State Medical Boards is considering adopting guidelines on what states should address when dealing with scope-of-practice issues. Some issues raised in the guidelines, to be presented for adoption at the May FSMB meeting:

  • Whether the scope-of-practice change is needed, and whether the need can be verified
  • Impact on patient safety
  • The licensure, certification and registration processes set up to handle the scope-of-practice change
  • If independent practice is called for, or if physician collaboration or supervision needed
  • Whether various regulatory boards will work together when investigating and making disciplinary decisions on complaints involving multiple practitioners
  • Disclosure requirements for practitioners' qualifications
  • What financial implications are tied to the change in scope of practice

Back to top


External links

AMA policy on scope of practice model legislation (link)

California Dept. of Consumer Affairs' Bureau of Naturopathic Medicine (link)

The American Assn. of Naturopathic Physicians (link)

American Psychiatric Assn. (link)

New Mexico's Board of Psychologist Examiners' prescribing regulations (link)

American Psychological Assn. (link)

California Naturopathic Doctors Assn. (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn