Profession

Federal judge upholds dismissal of Match lawsuit

The plaintiffs plan to take their case to a federal appellate court.

By Myrle Croasdale — Posted Feb. 14, 2005

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman dismissed a request to reconsider his previous August 2004 dismissal of the antitrust lawsuit against the National Resident Matching Program.

The suit, originally filed against the NRMP, its sponsoring organizations and 29 teaching hospitals, claimed that residents' salaries were artificially low and work hours overly long because the structure of the program made it impossible for residents to negotiate these issues.

The decision follows one made in August 2004, when Friedman dismissed Jung et al. v. Assn. of American Medical Colleges et al. after federal legislation passed earlier that summer shielding the Match from the class-action lawsuits and any future antitrust claims.

The plaintiffs have filed a notice to appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals.

An attorney for the NRMP said it was possible that arguments may be made regarding whether the court acted appropriately in dismissing the class-action suit because of the new legislation, whether the plaintiff had the opportunity to file an amended complaint or whether the NRMP had a right to go into arbitration.

The lawsuit has been an expensive one for the medical establishment, with each individual organization named in the suit hiring antitrust legal counsel, at one point involving more than 100 attorneys in the case. One attorney said costs to the teaching medical establishment were easily more than $20 million.

If the plaintiffs had proven their case in court, the Match process could have reverted to the time when job offers came with short decision deadlines and students had to choose between taking their first offer or risking it to wait for a better one.

A favorable decision for the plaintiffs could have also resulted in back pay for approximately 200,000 medical residents, an action that could have gutted teaching hospitals, industry watchers said.

Since the lawsuit was put into motion, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education limited residents' hours to an average of 80 hours a week. Residents' salaries, however, have not changed significantly. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, which heavily subsidizes graduate medical education, essentially capped spending at 1996 levels, which translates into limited dollars for resident salaries, according to health policy experts.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn