Business

Tax rules may stymie some hospital IT donations

Experts caution tax-exempt hospitals to seek IRS guidance before helping physicians with electronic medical records and e-prescribing technology.

By Katherine Vogt — Posted Nov. 13, 2006

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Some hospitals might not be able to take advantage of new federal rules that were supposed to pave the way for them to donate health care information technology to physicians. But according to Internal Revenue Service regulations, such donations could jeopardize the hospitals' tax exemptions.

The Office of the Inspector General of the Dept. of Health and Human Services issued new rules in August that were designed to protect arrangements in which hospitals donated software, hardware and other information technology for electronic medical records and e-prescribing to physicians. The rules created exemptions from federal Stark and anti-kickback regulations that govern such relationships.

However, concerns have been raised that tax-exempt hospitals may run afoul of Internal Revenue Service rules by making such donations. That's because IRS rules say that tax-exempt entities are only supposed to make donations that have a public benefit or help them further their charitable missions. It is unclear whether donations to physicians would be construed as having a private benefit instead.

The IRS said it is considering the issue, though no formal rulings or opinions have been issued. In a prepared statement, IRS spokesman Robert Marvin said: "Since this is a newly evolving area, we are reviewing all aspects to determine whether any private benefit is prohibited or incidental to the accomplishment of charitable purposes."

When the new rules were first published, hospitals were told they would have to approach the IRS to get clarification about the effect on their exemption, said Robert Belfort, co-chair of the health care practice at Manatt, Phelps & Phillips in New York. "That left a certain amount of uncertainty among hospitals in an area that is very undefined from the IRS perspective," he said.

Belfort said he expects that hospitals will start requesting private-letter rulings from the IRS to address their concerns before moving forward with any donation plans.

But Christopher Swift, a tax and health attorney with Baker Hostetler in Cleveland, said he expects the IRS to issue what it calls a revenue ruling on the subject. Unlike a private-letter ruling, which applies only to the entity that requested it, a revenue ruling would provide broader guidance to the general population of tax-exempt hospitals.

Both Swift and Belfort said they were hopeful the IRS would find some way to reconcile its guidelines with the opportunity afforded by the new HHS rules.

Swift said the response may be influenced by what types of donations are made. Donated software for electronic medical records could arguably be seen as having a public benefit because such records would enable the physician and hospital to work together to improve the quality of patient care. But software that also includes office management functions may raise more concerns because the benefit would be largely for the physician, he said.

"I think the thought that's going to be vexing hospital counsel is that if you have a program that does both ... what's the primary purpose of that software program? That's going to be a tough question," said Swift.

The uncertainty comes at a time when nonprofit hospitals have been increasingly under the microscope by the IRS, other regulators and the public over whether they are fulfilling their charitable missions.

Belfort said that scrutiny might make it more difficult for hospitals to feel comfortable making technology donations until they get better guidance from the IRS.

"It's always possible that there's just a general skittishness about it," he said.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Doctor-hospital e-relationship

About 71% of physicians are receptive to the idea of working with a hospital to acquire an electronic medical record system for their practices, according to a recent Harris Interactive survey.

Percentage of physicians who want to receive electronically from hospitals
Lab results 83%
Transcribed reports 68%
Diagnostic images 65%
Lab orders 36%
Patient medications 29%
Patient scheduling/admitting 19%
None of these 13%
Percentage of physicians who want hospitals to offer electronically
Discharge summaries to review/complete 85%
Hospital charts for review/sign-off 84%
Laboratory results 83%
Medical images 81%
Surgical notes 69%
Scheduling directly with hospital 66%
Patient financial data 44%
Other 4%
Nothing, not interested in electronic services 2%

Note: Survey has a margin of error of 5%. Respondents could select multiple options.

Source: McKesson Corp.

Back to top


Hawaii Blues to subsidize EMR purchase

The Hawaii Medical Service Assn., the Blue Cross Blue Shield plan that insures about 60% of the state's population, announced Sept. 20 that it will spend $20 million to help doctors in its network acquire electronic medical records systems.

The investment is part of a three-year, $50 million initiative designed to improve care and accelerate physician adoption of EMRs in Hawaii.

About $30 million of that is earmarked for hospital quality improvement initiatives, which may include use of information technology, and the remainder will go to physicians. HMSA will pay for half the cost of an EMR up to $20,000 per practice, said plan spokesman Charles Marshall.

HMSA and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts are among a handful of health plans that are subsidizing the cost of EMRs for physicians.

But many plans have subsidized the cost of electronic prescribing, personal digital assistants and other hardware for physicians.

Doctors who accept subsidized or donated technology from health plans don't have to worry about Stark law violations, but should look into potential implications under the anti-kickback statute, said Adele Waller, a health care attorney at Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Chicago.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn