AMA House of Delegates

AMA meeting: AMA backs Medicare pay reform plan

Delegates also approved several restructuring policies that go beyond the physician reimbursement issue.

By David Glendinning — Posted July 16, 2007

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The AMA House of Delegates threw its support behind organized medicine's plan to push for at least two years of positive Medicare updates while it continues to work on more permanent reforms.

Delegates at the Annual Meeting backed a report from the AMA Board of Trustees that lays out the strategy, unveiled earlier this year by the AMA and 76 other medical organizations. Under the plan, Congress would eliminate the physician pay cuts expected in 2008 and 2009 but also would establish a "date certain" by which to overhaul the entire payment system.

Support from the house for this approach will allow the Association to maintain its focus while it and the other organizations navigate through a couple of politically tricky years, said AMA Trustee J. James Rohack, MD. "This reflects the reality that in our current legislative cycle, the Congress isn't ready yet to bite the apple," he said. "We feel that in asking for the two years, this gets us through the 2008 presidential elections."

The desired result is a permanent pay system that bases annual changes in physician rates on the Medicare Economic Index, a measure of the increases in doctors' costs of providing care. The two years of immediate relief also would be based on the MEI.

Some delegates warned, however, that simply moving from the sustainable growth rate formula to one based on the MEI would be a good first step but not the solution to all of physicians' Medicare payment problems.

"We thought the SGR was good at one time, and the MEI could also come back to bite us in the future," said Marcy Zwelling, MD, an internist and delegate from Los Alamitos, Calif.

Instead of simply exchanging one problem-prone formula with another, Medicare should be transformed into a program of defined contributions, rather than defined benefits, Dr. Zwelling said. Under such a concept, which the AMA supports, Medicare would pay a set amount for a beneficiary's care and give him or her the choice of how to spend that money.

A more specific proposal for Medicare defined contribution plans was included in a separate Council on Medical Service report, which explored several strategies to strengthen Medicare that go beyond the physician payment issue. Delegates approved the proposal, which would transition the system to one that requires beneficiaries to pay the difference between the premiums for the benefits they select and what the government offers as its set share.

The house also approved recommendations in the report to implement a single cost-sharing structure for beneficiaries and restructure Medicare's age-eligibility requirements. Such bold reforms would be necessary to ensure that Medicare survives the increasing strain on its finances, while maintaining many of its core features, the council said.

The house referred for further review two recommendations that would have called for combining Medicare's hospital and doctor trust funds and phasing in a high annual deductible for all Medicare services.

The aim in combining the Medicare Part A and Part B trust funds is to make the program more efficient by better targeting funding depending on medical needs. For example, if more spending were needed for physician services, and that translated into less demand for hospital care, funds could be allocated accordingly.

But this move might prove difficult, because the physician side of the program is voluntary, while the hospital side is mandatory for anyone who signs up for Medicare, said Richard W. Whitten, MD, an internist and delegate from Kent, Wash.

The concept of a high annual deductible aims to encourage beneficiaries to use Medicare services only when they truly need them. But some physicians, such as Larry S. Fields, MD, a family physician and delegate from Flatwoods, Ky., worried that this could create a barrier to needed care.

"The high deductible causes you a problem with people not seeking care until it's too late," he said.

The AMA Board of Trustees will report back on these two issues at the Interim Meeting in November.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Meeting Notes: Access to care

Issue: Surgeons worry that nonphysicians could encroach upon doctors of medicine and osteopathy when it comes to performing complex surgical procedures.
Proposed action: Adopt the definition of "surgery" developed by the American College of Surgeons. [Adopted]

Issue: Medicare Advantage plans are paid higher rates than fee-for-service plans, and private fee-for-service plans "deem" physicians as participants after filing one claim.
Proposed action: Seek to eliminate subsidies to Medicare Advantage and prohibit physician deeming without a contract. [Adopted]

Issue: Some physicians worry that the gulf between Medicare payments for primary care doctors and specialists is widening.
Proposed action: Recommend the voting representation on the AMA Relative Value Scale Update Committee, which suggests how much Medicare should value each service, be changed to include more primary care expertise. [Referred for study]

Issue: Physicians are concerned the National Quality Forum could supplant the Physician Consortium on Performance Improvement in developing quality measures.
Proposed action: Oppose any effort to expand the NQF in such a way and report on the forum's activities at the Interim Meeting. [Adopted]

Issue: The federal government could consider further limiting the prices paid for drugs, medical procedures and other services.
Proposed action: Oppose price controls in the health care industry and continue promoting market-based strategies to make health care affordable. [Adopted]

Issue: Immigrants and foreign visitors often lack health insurance.
Proposed action: Support legislation requiring the government pay physicians for federally mandated care, regardless of patient immigration status. [Adopted]

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn