Government

Senate panel OKs SCHIP funding bill; Bush threatens to veto it

The measure would boost program funding by $35 billion, enough to cover an additional 3.3 million children.

By Doug Trapp — Posted Aug. 6, 2007

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Add the State Children's Health Insurance Program to the list of issues on which Congress and President Bush fundamentally disagree.

On July 17, Bush promised to veto a bipartisan Senate SCHIP reauthorization bill to increase the program's five-year funding by $35 billion, from $25 billion to $60 billion. The measure, approved 17-4 by the Senate Finance Committee on July 19, with six Republicans voting in favor, would allow another 3.3 million uninsured children to gain coverage. SCHIP now covers 6 million children.

The veto threat cast a shadow over the Senate bill, a compromise carefully negotiated over several weeks. The measure backed away from the $50 billion boost, for total five-year funding of $75 billion, approved by House and Senate lawmakers May 7 in their budget resolution.

House leaders were expected to stick with the $50 billion funding increase in their SCHIP reauthorization legislation, said a House Energy and Commerce Committee aide. At press time, that measure was scheduled for a committee vote on July 25.

Bush said he views the Senate bill as an attempt to federalize health care. He also objected to lawmakers' plan to raise the extra $35 billion by increasing the national cigarette tax by 61 cents to $1. "If Congress continues to insist upon expanding health care through the SCHIP program -- which, by the way, would entail a huge tax increase for the American people -- I'll veto the bill," Bush said.

In his 2008 budget plan, Bush proposed adding $5 billion to SCHIP over five years and allowing enhanced federal matching funds only for enrollees at or below 200% of the federal poverty level. But supporters of SCHIP expansion said Bush's proposal doesn't have enough funding to maintain existing enrollment.

The Senate SCHIP bill addressed a number of concerns raised by state Medicaid agencies, consumer advocates, think tanks and organized medicine over the years. For example, it would allow states to use information from other federal means-tested programs to enroll people in SCHIP.

The measure also would allow states to cover pregnant women's prenatal care. It would limit new enhanced federal matching funds to SCHIP enrollees at or below 300% of the poverty level. Currently, SCHIP has no specific eligibility ceiling, and states have been granted federal waivers to cover enrollees earning up to 350% of poverty.

The American Medical Association supports the Senate SCHIP bill, wrote Executive Vice President and CEO Michael D. Maves, MD, in a July 17 letter to Sen. Max Baucus (D, Mont.), chair of the Senate Finance Committee and one of the architects of the bill.

"We believe that this bipartisan proposal is a responsible, measured approach to reauthorizing and improving SCHIP," Dr. Maves wrote. He also called on the Senate panel to support funding to avert Medicare physician payment cuts in 2008 and 2009. House leaders included a provision in their SCHIP bill to stop those cuts. Dr. Maves also praised the Senate bill provision to pay for the SCHIP increase by boosting the cigarette tax.

The Bush administration's objections to the Senate bill are fundamental and numerous, wrote Health and Human Service Secretary Mike Leavitt in a July 17 letter to the Finance Committee. Although the administration is committed to reauthorizing SCHIP, the 61-cent cigarette tax boost is a "massive, regressive" increase that would likely draw revenue away from state budgets by depressing cigarette sales, he said.

"Ironically, the proposed legislation would increase taxes on low-income taxpayers as a way to fund health coverage for low-income individuals. At the same time, the [bill] would allow children who live in higher-income families to become eligible for government-run health care," Leavitt wrote.

He also said the bill's insufficient funding beginning in 2013 would make SCHIP unsustainable. The Senate measure would provide $8.6 billion in additional funding in 2012 but only $600 million in 2013, the Congressional Budget Office estimates.

Baucus said in a same-day letter to Leavitt that the bill is intended to be a five-year reauthorization and that he hopes "by then, Congress and the next president will have entered into discussions about how to fundamentally reform our health care system."

Baucus said the cigarette tax is a health measure because it would prevent nearly 2 million children from smoking. He noted that fewer than 10% of SCHIP children are in families earning more than 200% of poverty.

Three Republicans on the Senate panel, in a July 11 letter to Bush, questioned why the administration has approved waivers allowing states to cover adults in SCHIP while criticizing a Senate bill provision grandfathering in such coverage. SCHIP covers approximately 600,000 adults. Leavitt said the administration will have helped a majority of them to make the transition into Medicaid by October.

Some medical associations support a larger funding increase than the $35 billion in the Senate SCHIP reauthorization measure. The AMA backs the bill, but also would support a bigger boost. At their June Annual Meeting, Association delegates passed a resolution calling for $60 billion in additional funding.

The American Academy of Pediatrics would like $50 billion in extra SCHIP funding, said its president, Jay E. Berkelhamer, MD. "While the $35 billion included in this bill is a good start, it's not enough to cover all the eligible but unenrolled children in either SCHIP or Medicaid," he said.

A $50 billion boost would better cover unenrolled but eligible children, wrote Joel S. Levine, chair of the American College of Physicians' board of regents, in a July 17 letter to the Senate panel. The ACP, like the AMA, said the Senate should prevent cuts to Medicare physician fees scheduled to begin on Jan. 1, 2008.

The American Academy of Family Physicians supports both the Senate bill and the 61-cent cigarette tax but would like $50 billion in new funding, said spokeswoman Janelle Davis.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

SCHIP shape

The Senate bill on the State Children's Health Insurance Program would:

  • Cover an additional 3.3 million uninsured children.
  • Raise $35 billion over five years by increasing the federal cigarette tax by 61 cents.
  • Allow states to use SCHIP funds to help pay for private group coverage for people eligible for SCHIP or Medicaid.
  • Limit new enhanced federal matching funds to enrollees at or below 300% of the federal poverty level and transition childless adults into Medicaid.
  • Allow states to cover pregnant women's prenatal care.
  • Create a funding pool to cover future state shortfalls and base allotments on more recent estimates of uninsured children.
  • Provide $100 million in grants over five years for SCHIP outreach and enrollment efforts.
  • Require the Dept. of Health and Human Services to work with states to develop pediatric care quality measures.

Back to top


Medicare pay tags along on House SCHIP bill

Unlike the Senate State Children's Health Insurance Program reauthorization bill, the proposed House SCHIP bill would give doctors a slight reprieve from predicted Medicare payment cuts for two years.

Initial drafts of the Children's Health and Medicare Protection Act included 0.5% payment increases for physicians in both 2008 and 2009, instead of the 9.9% and 5% reductions predicted under current law. To fund these updates and a larger SCHIP expansion than the one envisioned in the Senate bill, House lawmakers would reduce subsidies to Medicare managed care plans and levy a new tax on tobacco products. Bill handlers hoped for a quick turnaround on the legislation and passage by the full House before the congressional summer recess, which begins Aug. 6.

The American Medical Association and the seniors group AARP have launched a joint ad campaign of at least $1.3 million urging passage of the House bill, which also was expected to include more Medicare enhancements for seniors.

"This bill is a win-win-win," said AMA President-elect Nancy H. Nielsen, MD, PhD. "It helps America's seniors and America's children get the health care they need and pays for it with a tobacco tax and an end to subsidies to insurance companies."

If the House passes the SCHIP and Medicare language intact, the bill would face difficult negotiations on differences with the Senate measure when Congress returns from its recess. President Bush already has threatened to veto the Senate version, which would require significantly less new spending than the House bill.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn