Government

Medicaid Rx pad security rule is delayed

The AMA applauds postponement of the compliance deadline, as stakeholders plan to seek further clarification from CMS.

By Doug Trapp — Posted Oct. 15, 2007

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Physicians and pharmacists now have six more months to prepare for a law requiring many Medicaid prescriptions to be written on tamper-resistant pads.

Congress adopted the delay in late September. President Bush signed the measure Sept. 29 -- two days before the new law was to take effect.

The provision mandating such pads was part of a military spending bill adopted in May. It required that by Oct. 1, written Medicaid prescriptions have at least one feature to prevent unauthorized copying, erasure or modification, or counterfeiting, and include all three features by Oct. 1, 2008.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services issued guidance on Aug. 17 specifying that the law did not apply to prescriptions paid for by Medicaid managed care organizations or to electronic, faxed or phoned prescriptions, among other exemptions.

Stakeholders on the issue, including the American Medical Association, generally applauded the vote to postpone the rules until April 1, 2008. "The six-month delay addresses physicians' concerns that the implementation deadline of Oct. 1 was unreasonable and could harm Medicaid patients' access to prescribed drugs," said AMA Board of Trustees Chair Edward L. Langston, MD.

John Norton, spokesman for the National Community Pharmacists Assn., said a longer delay would have been a lot to ask for. "Six months is what we figured was ultimately reasonable."

American Pharmacists Assn. spokesman Hrant Jamgochian gave a qualified thanks for the delay. "At the same time, it doesn't compare to the 18 months it took to implement the New York State program," he said.

Congressional lawmakers had introduced other legislation to postpone the law for a longer period or scale it back. The House version of the Patient and Pharmacy Protection Act of 2007 permanently would have limited the measure to Schedule II controlled substances. The Senate version would have initially limited the law to Schedule II drugs, then applied it to all prescriptions on Oct. 1, 2009.

But both bill sponsors opted instead to support the six-month delay. Sen. Sherrod Brown (D, Ohio), sponsor of the Senate pharmacy bill, said postponing implementation would prevent chaos in pharmacies and allow Medicaid beneficiaries to fill prescriptions without interruption. Rep. Charlie Wilson (D, Ohio) called the move "just good common sense."

About 330 million Medicaid prescriptions not paid for by managed care plans were written in 2006, according to the National Assn. of Chain Drug Stores. That's out of a national total of 3.42 billion prescriptions overall.

It wasn't yet clear how many of those prescriptions the CMS guidance would exempt from the law.

Nine states have programs using prescription pads with security features meeting all CMS requirements, according to CMS.

More to clarify

CMS issued a six-page "frequently-asked-questions" document on Sept. 13, in addition to its three-page Aug. 17 guidance on the law. But Jamgochian said the agency still had questions to answer.

For example, he asked, what happens if a pharmacist accepts a prescription that doesn't meet the security feature requirements? "Does that mean the pharmacist is going to be on the hook for that?"

Also, can pharmaceutical companies or pharmacies provide these new pads to physicians for free? "That might potentially help with streamlining and standardizing," Jamgochian said.

CMS' Aug. 17 guidance said pharmacists could provide emergency refills if they receive a compliant prescription within 72 hours. But does this rule preempt the laws of such states as Virginia, which allows pharmacists to wait one week for the proper prescription?

Whether the newly passed provision delayed the entire national law by six months or only the law's first phase was not clear at press time. The Aug. 17 CMS guidance said prescription pads were to have had at least one security feature by Oct. 1, 2007, and all three features by Oct. 1, 2008. The agency did not respond to calls regarding this issue.

"That's one of the questions we're going to follow up with CMS with," Jamgochian said.

The extra six months should provide enough time for family physicians to prepare to comply with the Medicaid prescription pad law, said John Swanson, director of the American Academy of Family Physicians' practice support division.

Some physicians have experienced difficulty acquiring prescription pads to meet the law, said Cynthia Hughes, a coding and compliance specialist with the AAFP.

Swanson, however, said the AAFP had not been deluged with phone calls from members about this issue. "I would be surprised if there were a lot of people who were not aware," he said.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

State status

Nine states already mandate the use of tamper-resistant prescription pads that meet the new federal law's security standards. But these state statutes are too limited to meet all of the national law's other requirements. Here is a look at the types of prescriptions subject to the nine states' rules.

All prescriptions: New Jersey, New York

All controlled substances: California, Indiana, Kentucky, Wyoming, Idaho (Idaho's prescription pads will satisfy only the first phase of the federal standards)

Schedule II controlled substances: Maine, Texas

Medicaid: Florida

Source: The American Pharmacists Assn., September

Back to top


External links

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Intergovernmental Center, on the Medicaid tamper-resistant prescription pad law. (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn