Business

Making room for faith: Handling religious expression at the office

Legal knowledge, administrative common sense and sensitivity can help balance the rights of believers to proclaim their beliefs and of nonbelievers to be left alone.

By Larry Stevens amednews correspondent — Posted Feb. 11, 2008

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

You might have office staff or colleagues who want to display signs of their faith on jewelry, clothes or desks, discuss their religion's tenets, or even openly proselytize fellow staff and patients. You might have just as many office staff or colleagues who would rather not be bothered about religion or are openly hostile to it.

So how are doctors supposed to deal with that conflict without upsetting employees, ending up in court, or appearing on a cable news talk show as the latest example of the "war on Christmas"?

The legalities of handling religion in the workplace require that you make reasonable accommodations for people's religious beliefs, but there can be a fine line between what is reasonable and what is not. Experts say allowing people to express themselves through religious displays and conversations, while allowing nonbelievers their space, is as much about good management as being aware of the law.

The law governing religion in the workplace is Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employers from discriminating against individuals because of their religion. It mandates that companies make reasonable attempts to accommodate employees' religious practices.

The federal law applies to businesses with 15 or more employees, but some states apply the requirements to smaller firms. And, experts say it is not clear whether doctors who are partners would be counted. In any case, except for a solo or perhaps a two-person practice, it's best to play it safe and assume you're required to comply with the law, experts say.

The first part of the requirement -- the prohibition against religious discrimination in hiring, firing and promotions -- is generally familiar to doctors and is straightforward enough to be easily applied. The second part -- accommodating reasonable religious practices -- is more problematic, said Stephen Fink, a labor law attorney with Thompson & Knight in Dallas.

"The thing doctors sometimes get hung up on is the concept of reasonableness. It's hard to define. But most people know what reasonable means when they look honestly at the practice," Fink said.

For example, if a Muslim employee wants to be able to say midday prayers and there is a storeroom the adherent can use without disturbing anyone, the group should make that accommodation, he said. On the other hand, if the prayer has to be done in an office where other people are working, the disruption to the smooth flow of work would probably render that accommodation unreasonable, Fink said. And a group wouldn't have to accommodate an adherent of a religion that requires prayer, but doesn't mandate specific times, he said.

The same accommodation rule applies to time off for religious holidays. Few groups would be able to accommodate frequent days off, such as a Sabbath on which the office is open. But groups should try to accommodate less frequent holidays, attorneys say.

Groups don't have to pay employees for time off for religious holidays. But Peter Lucash, CEO of Digital CPE, a medical practice training and consulting company, suggests combining all paid days off -- vacation time, sick days, personal days and religious holidays -- into one package. "Giving staff people a set number of days, which they can use any way they want, makes life much easier for administrators and staff," Lucash says.

The allowance of religious dress relies on the same accommodation rule. Kevin Zwetsch, an attorney with Fowler White Boggs Banker in Tampa, Fla., points out that it's important to distinguish between apparel actually required by the religion, such as yarmulkes and turbans, and that which is merely decorative, like jewelry depicting a cross or Star of David.

Groups are required to allow religious dress unless it presents a safety or hygienic danger or hampers the office workflow. Groups are not required to allow religious jewelry, but Zwetsch and others suggest that doing so can be good for morale. "No one will be offended if someone else is wearing a small cross. There's no need to make an issue of it," he said.

From preaching to harassment

While groups are required to try to accommodate religious practices, they are under no obligation to allow religious-related activity not actually required by the religion, such as displaying religious items on a desk or proselytizing co-workers.

Diana Scott, the Los Angeles-based co-chair of the national labor and employment practice at Greenberg Traurig, says that proselytizing can easily be perceived as harassment. "The implication is 'my religion is better than yours,' and that attitude can spark trouble in the office," she said.

Of course, most groups would not want to create an atmosphere where someone is afraid to, say, invite a co-worker to a church supper. Scott says the line is similar to the one that groups should draw when it comes to sexual harassment. "It's fine to compliment someone's hair. But if you do it every day, or to people you don't know, or too loudly, it can be harassing," she says.

Most experts say there are two areas where even gentle religious-based invitations should be forbidden. The first is with patients. "Many patients who are unhappy with something that happens in the office just won't come back rather than complain. So you won't have an opportunity to rectify the situation," Lucash said.

The other area of concern is when the invitation comes from a manager or doctor to a staff member. Fink said, "If an office manager invites someone to a church function and they don't go, they may think it will affect their job standing. And if later they are passed over for a promotion, they can claim that was the reason."

The display of religious items on someone's desk may or may not cause problems, depending on the size of the items, whether the office is shared, and the attitudes of the people who have to look at it.

Scott says groups should have written policies about what can be placed on worker's desks. "This should be a general policy, not aimed specifically at religious items." She suggests that the policy state something like, "In order to maintain a neat and uncluttered office, the only personal items an employee may keep on his or her desktop is one small photograph of a family member, friend or pet."

Scott also believes that groups would be better off prohibiting all bulletin board postings that are not business-related.

Lucash agrees that many general medical office best practices can prevent problems related to religious issues. For example, giving receptionists a script that specifies what to say when greeting a patient will eliminate the possibility of such potentially offending phrases such as "Have a blessed day," which the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2001 ruled an employee of a logistics firm could say to fellow workers but could not say to customers and other outsiders.

"In general, you want to standardize customer service as much as possible," Lucash says.

Physicians are legally placed under the same restrictions as administrators or managers. But doctors who have ethical or religious-based qualms about performing certain procedures or prescribing certain drugs represent a separate issue.

Scott says groups should create detailed job descriptions listing some of the procedures the group handles. Because in many cases the controversial issues will be abortion and birth control, they should be specifically addressed in applicable job descriptions. Newly hired doctors should be required to sign a statement that they can perform the duties specified in the job description.

If a doctor, after working at the group for a time, has a religious conversion and can no longer fulfill the duties specified in the job description, the group can, depending on the employment or partnership contract, fire the employed doctor or buy out the partner. Or, if some accommodation can be made to keep the doctor, the group might try that route. "That will depend on many different business issues, such as whether there are enough doctors to fill in," Fink said.

Patients, new and existing, who call to make an appointment with a doctor should be told if he or she does not perform certain procedures.

Fortunately, most people of faith want their religions to be a source of comfort, not conflict. But even employees with the best of intentions can sometimes create problems. Experts say standard rules for the workplace, careful observance of the law, and a dose of sensitivity will help groups avoid those issues.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Government guidance

There is no national legislation that clarifies what is "reasonable" for religion in the workplace. But the Clinton administration in 1997 released guidelines on religious exercise and expression that still apply to federal employees, and are often used by private employers. The full guidelines are available online (link). Some examples:

You can

  • Allow employees to keep a Bible or Koran in their private desks and read it during breaks.
  • Allow employees to proselytize or invite co-workers to religious services.
  • Invite employees to services, or post a bulletin-board invitation to a lunch-hour Bible study.
  • Adjust work schedules and rules to accommodate an employee's religious observance, garb, or religious-based refusal to participate in a particular assignment, as long as a substitute can be found (if necessary) or the adjustment otherwise does not cause an undue burden or safety hazard.
  • Allow an employee to lead a prayer at a staff meeting, as long as supervisor makes it clear that employees are not required to participate.
  • Allow decorations for religious holidays.
  • Have uniform rules for the display of any posters or other personal effects, religious or not.

You must not

  • Allow employees to continue proselytizing after the target requests it stop.
  • Hire, fire, promote or make any personnel decisions based on an employee's faith.
  • Explicitly or implicitly insist an employee participate, or refuse to participate, in religious services.
  • Allow employees to make repeated derogatory remarks about a fellow employee's faith, or lack thereof.
  • Honor an employee's request to work only with employees of a certain faith.

Source: "Guidelines on Religious Exercise and Religious Expression in the Federal Workplace," the White House Office of the Press Secretary, August 1997

Back to top


Running a religious-based practice

Civil rights law says you may not discriminate in hiring based on religion. But it doesn't mean you can't advertise your practice as being religion-friendly.

The exact number of U.S. religious-based practices is unknown. The Christian Medical and Dental Society says about 11,400 of its 16,000 members are physicians or residents, but most of them do not work in practices designated as Christian. Anecdotally, U.S. religious-based medical groups are relatively rare and primarily Christian.

Christian practices fulfill a need in many communities. So religious doctors who decide to offer a Christian-based practice (or a practice based on another religion) may attract patients -- and repel others -- because of their link to a certain faith.

While there are significant differences between a religious-based and a secular-based practice, Ruth A. Bolton, MD, said her Christian-based family practice in many ways differed "very little from a non-Christian practice." Patients being treated for typical family practice maladies such as bruises, fevers, or infections might not have seen any difference from the care they'd get at a secular practice. And in fact, Dr. Bolton's group, which she started in 1997 in Plymouth, Minn., and which has had at its height eight doctors, served many non-Christians including Muslims and a large number of Russian Jews who have a large population in the community.

But there are three primary differences between a secular-based and a Christian-based practice as exemplified by Dr. Bolton's group.

First, the waiting room décor unabashedly proclaimed the group's Christian identity through its artwork and the Bibles made available to patients.

On the clinical side, doctors would not provide or refer patients for procedures, such as abortions, that were counter to the group's religious beliefs. (That is consistent with AMA ethical policy.) More importantly for patients, group members would sometimes offer to -- and always be willing to -- pray with their patients.

Dr. Bolton says her practice's unique identity drew patients from more than an hour away.

And she said that when it was sold for financial reasons to a larger medical group and lost its Christian identity in many patients' minds, it initially lost about 25% of its patients.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn