Government

Doctors still can try for bonuses as Medicare expands quality reporting

CMS adds measures and will allow reporting through selected clinical quality registries.

By David Glendinning — Posted May 26, 2008

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

It's not too late for physicians to begin participating in Medicare's pay-for-reporting program. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has implemented a number of changes aimed at enticing more doctors to give the program valuable quality information while striving for a 1.5% bonus on their Medicare payments.

The Physician Quality Reporting Initiative was in effect for only the last six months of 2007 but runs for the entire year in 2008.

In addition, the list of quality measures has expanded from 74 to 119. CMS has added two structural measures -- one that rewards the use of electronic medical records and the other for e-prescribing.

Although nearly half of the year is already over, physicians who have not yet participated in the initiative still can qualify for a full-year bonus. If a physician is able to report at least three measures for at least 80% of the patients to whom those measures apply, he or she could still receive the 1.5% lump-sum bonus on all of their allowable charges for the year.

Some of the quality measures, such as blood pressure control for diabetes mellitus patients, need only be reported once per applicable patient during the entire reporting period, instead of every time the associated test or procedure is given. A doctor therefore could hit the 80% mark even if the physician missed an opportunity to report on patients earlier in the year.

New options for doctors

For physicians who may have missed their chance for a full-year bonus, however, CMS also is offering a six-month reporting period that starts July 1. For that option, participating doctors can't report individual measures but instead must report a single measures group pertaining to a particular chronic condition.

A physician who sees a significant number of diabetes mellitus patients, for example, might want to consider reporting on the diabetes measures group. It contains measures associated with five tests: hemoglobin A1c, low density lipoprotein, blood pressure, urine and eyes.

In addition to diabetes, the measures groups cover end-stage renal disease, chronic kidney disease and preventive care.

CMS also is offering another reporting option that could make the 2008 PQRI attractive to a wider array of physicians. The agency will allow doctors to report individual measures or measures groups through approved clinical quality registries instead of using special CPT-II codes and temporary G-codes on claims.

Many physicians already give quality data to registries, such as the National Cardiovascular Data Registry and the ones maintained by the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the American Osteopathic Assn. As long as the individual measures or measures groups sent to the registry meet the same minimum requirements as those reported via Medicare claims, the participating physician could be eligible for either a half-year or full-year bonus.

"If a physician is already reporting information that pertains to PQRI measures, it would be certainly less burdensome to the physicians if we would accept the information from the registries, rather than require the physicians to duplicate submission of data by not only sending it to the registry but also sending it to us in claims," said Michael T. Rapp, MD, director of the CMS quality measurement and health assessment group. The agency will announce the qualified registries on Aug. 31 and will begin accepting report submissions in December.

AMA help for participants

The American Medical Association is urging physicians who are considering participating in the 2008 PQRI to review carefully the instructions and frequently asked questions posted on the CMS Web site for the initiative (link).

The agency no longer can reduce the 1.5% bonus for a physician if it determines that the doctor chose measures that applied to relatively too few patients in his or her practice. CMS reduced bonuses in this way for the 2007 program. The agency will, however, deny outright the extra payment for doctors who do not meet the minimum reporting requirements. This would mean that the six months to a year of extra administrative work the practice invested for PQRI would reap no financial benefit.

To help physicians navigate the program and make sure that they do not fall short, the AMA has posted a set of tools on its PQRI Web site (link). For each quality measure, the Association provides a detailed description, code specifications that identify eligible patients, and a data collection sheet to help physicians and staffers compile the necessary claims information.

The AMA produced the information in collaboration with CMS, Mathematica Policy Research Inc., and the National Committee for Quality Assurance. Many of the PQRI measures were developed by the AMA-convened Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement with the help of NCQA and medical specialty societies.

Administration officials hope that many more physicians will decide to try for the bonus and enhance Medicare's quality efforts. "We're eager to encourage more physicians and other eligible professionals to participate in the program, and that is the reason for these various options," Dr. Rapp said.

Last year, only about 16% of physicians and other eligible health professionals submitted at least one quality code on their claims, CMS said. Only slightly more than half of those doctors reported enough to be eligible for a bonus. The agency will distribute the extra pay in mid-July.

Although some observers said the participation rate was not very high last year, Medicare officials were cheered by what they saw as good representation by many different types of physicians and medical practices, said CMS Deputy Administrator Herb B. Kuhn at a May 8 congressional hearing. He noted that the 2007 program had never been attempted before and ran for only six months.

More doctors eventually will come around to the promise of the pay-for-reporting program, Kuhn predicted. "Physicians are sometimes slow adopters."

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Reporting options

The 2008 Physician Quality Reporting Initiative provides several ways for physicians to report quality measures and qualify for a bonus. Doctors using clinical data registries will not know until later this year whether CMS will accept reports from their registries.

Reporting period Jan. 1-Dec. 31 (for full-year bonus)

Claims-based reporting: Report three or more individual measures for at least 80% of applicable patients. (If fewer than three measures apply, report each for at least 80% of applicable patients.)

Registry-based reporting: Report three or more individual measures for at least 80% of applicable patients OR report one group of measures applying to a particular condition for 30 consecutive patients or at least 80% of applicable patients.

Reporting period July 1-Dec. 31 (for half-year bonus)

Claims-based reporting: Report one group of measures for 15 consecutive patients or at least 80% of applicable patients.

Registry-based reporting: Report three or more individual measures for at least 80% of applicable patients. (If fewer than three measures apply, report each for at least 80% of applicable patients.) OR, report one group of measures for 15 consecutive patients or at least 80% of applicable patients.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Back to top


A PQRI scenario

1. A physician sees a patient in July who has a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The doctor decides to start reporting the group of Medicare measures for diabetes.

2. On the claim for the visit, the physician reports HCPCS code G8485 with a zero charge to signal that he or she is starting participation in the PQRI.

3. The physician reviews the five individual measures in the diabetes measures group and uses the claim to report any that apply. For example, if the patient's most recent LDL level was less than 100 mg/dL, the doctor would add CPT code 3048F to the claim with a zero charge.

4. The physician repeats step 3 for the next 14 diabetic patients.

5. After the six-month reporting period ends, Medicare reviews the doctor's claims to see if he or she qualified for a bonus. If the physician failed to achieve 15 consecutive reports on diabetes patients, the doctor still can qualify if reporting was done for at least 80% of the diabetic patients seen during that period.

6. If he or she qualifies, sometime in the summer of 2009 the physician will receive a lump-sum bonus equal to 1.5% of all of his or her Medicare payments claimed for services between July 1 and Dec. 31, 2008.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Back to top


Important dates

Jan. 1: Full-year reporting period began. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services started accepting claims-based reports on individual quality measures.

July 1: Half-year reporting period begins. CMS starts accepting claims-based reports on groups of measures.

Mid-July: CMS to issue confidential quality feedback and bonus payments to 2007 participants.

Aug. 31: CMS to announce clinical data registries from which it will accept reports.

Dec. 1: CMS to start accepting registry-based reports.

Dec. 31: Full- and half-year reporting periods end.

Feb. 28, 2009: CMS to accept last claims-based and registry-based reports for 2008.

Summer 2009: CMS to issue confidential quality feedback and bonus payments to 2008 participants.

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn