Opinion

Take the slow track on RAC program

Congress should order a yearlong moratorium on Medicare's recovery audits, then reconsider whether to continue the redundant and burdensome program.

Posted Sept. 8, 2008.

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

It will take an act of Congress to keep yet another set of eyes from poring over medical records for billing errors when physicians file Medicare claims. And Congress has good reason to act.

Numerous audits already are in place to identify and collect Medicare overpayments. But beginning as early as this month, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services -- by Congressional mandate -- will start hiring outside auditors to look into claims by physicians, hospitals and others through yet another postpayment review. It's redundant, but CMS plans to have recovery audit contractors, commonly known as RACs, in all 50 states by January 2010.

It's now up to Congress to pass a pending bill that would put a one-year moratorium on the program. Lawmakers can then determine what comprehensive changes are needed or if the entire program should be deep-sixed.

Inpatient hospitals, not physicians, likely will be the more productive target for auditors paid based on the number of overpayments and underpayments they uncover. A recent CMS report about a three-year RAC pilot program that ended in March showed that only about $20 million of the roughly $990 million in overpayments identified came from doctors.

But that's little consolation for doctors who find themselves asked to justify their billing. California, Florida and New York doctors are already familiar with the hassles, based on their experiences with the pilot. One California urologist said he received a demand for patient medical records so the company could determine whether he charged too much for office-administered drugs more than four years earlier. Such demands for years-old medical records are not uncommon.

And beyond the time-consuming and costly burden of filling those requests, physicians who want to challenge RAC accusations also must take time and resources away from their patients to gather physician orders, progress notes and other documentation often housed in other facilities.

In a letter to Rep. Lois Capps (D, Calif.), who has sponsored a bill that would impose the one-year moratorium, American Medical Association Executive Vice President Michael D. Maves, MD, MBA, said the RAC program "has been an enormous burden on the affected physicians and has failed to further the worthy goal of eradicating frequent billing mistakes." The AMA believes Medicare overpayments and underpayments could be resolved more effectively through outreach and education.

The AMA has pushed for and received numerous changes in the event a permanent RAC program launches: A promise that CMS will establish limits on the number of medical records an RAC can request. A requirement that RACs have a medical director and coding experts. Requirements that reviewers' credentials must be provided upon request, and that RACs can only evaluate claims filed after Oct. 1, 2007, and no more than three years old. Previously, there was no limit on how far RACs could dig back through claims.

In addition, companies that were once paid based on how many overpayments they recovered also will now be financially rewarded for discovering underpayments to physicians, hospitals and others. That was a change made partway through the demonstration.

While those are improvements, far more needs to be done. For starters, RACs are still paid on a contingency basis, a "bounty hunter" system that needs to go away. The AMA also believes it is critical for CMS to work to educate physicians on where billing errors lie. Without education, physicians will continue to be audited. The AMA, too, wants to see CMS raise the minimum claim amount that can trigger an audit. Right now a $10 claim can be audited. The Association wants that minimum to be at least $25.

Among other improvements the AMA is calling for, and which CMS could accomplish administratively: That RACs pay physicians' costs for copying medical records, a courtesy hospitals already receive. That RACs use physician reviewers of the same specialty and licensed in the same state as a physician being audited. And that physicians be shielded from audits springing from differences in coding interpretations.

Physicians already encounter enough administrative hassles in the Medicare program. It's time for Congress to place the one-year moratorium on the RAC program and prevent another burden from being placed on doctors' already-strained backs.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn