Government

CMS delays enforcing limits on SCHIP funding

States covering children in higher-income families will continue receiving federal funds.

By Doug Trapp — Posted Sept. 15, 2008

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The Bush administration will not enforce a policy limiting State Children's Health Insurance Program federal funding to children in lower-income families -- at least for now.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services directive, announced last year, went into effect Aug. 17. It bars federal matching funds for SCHIP coverage of children whose families are at 250% of the federal poverty level or higher. States can get around the prohibition only if they already cover 95% of children in families at or below 200% of the poverty level and can document that private health insurance coverage for this income group has not declined by two or more percentage points in the previous five years. Any new enrollees at higher incomes must have been uninsured for at least one year.

But CMS spokesman Jeff Nelligan said the agency is "not taking compliance action" on the directive and declined to elaborate on whether the agency intends to enforce its requirements later. That means states can continue to cover higher-income groups under SCHIP and will continue to receive federal funds.

CMS will go forward with determining which states may have met the directive's standards and will work with those states on strategies to ensure lower-income kids do not drop private health coverage in favor of SCHIP, Nelligan said. CMS previously had announced that more than half of the 17 states subject to the directive may have met its requirements, and that the directive would not end federal funding of existing SCHIP enrollees at 250% of the poverty level or higher.

The directive attracted a significant amount of flak. Democrats in Congress offered legislation to block it, several states sued CMS to overturn the directive, and one state -- California -- announced Aug. 12 that it would not comply because the order violated state law. The American Medical Association also asked the Bush administration to rescind the directive.

At least six states adopted plans to expand SCHIP eligibility above 250% of poverty before CMS issued the directive in August 2007. All put the expansions on hold, reduced their scope or used state-only funding instead, says a May report by the Georgetown University Health Policy Institute's Center for Children and Families. More than 30,000 expanded-eligibility children have not been enrolled in SCHIP in these states because of the directive, the report estimates. SCHIP covers approximately 6 million children and parents.

Jim King, MD, president of the American Academy of Family Physicians, said the AAFP is pleased that CMS decided not to enforce the directive. He added, however, that working with CMS is frustrating because the agency sometimes issues such strict rules, holds them over the heads of those who would be affected, and later backs off.

"You just really don't know what you're supposed to do," Dr. King said.

Senate Finance Committee Chair Max Baucus (D, Mont.) said agency officials may have listened to reason. "This statement seems to show that CMS is finally making the connection between its misguided SCHIP directive and the real kids it could hurt."

Sen. John D. Rockefeller (D, W.Va.), who led an effort earlier this year to kill the directive, said it still needs to be rescinded. "Through this directive, they are still committed to denying children's access to health care. [It's] still on the books, and the damage has already been done."

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn