Business

Studies produce no consensus on Pennsylvania Blues merger

The state's insurance department must decide on the Independence Blue Cross-Highmark merger without benefit of a clear mandate from reports it commissioned.

By Emily Berry — Posted Oct. 6, 2008

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

A pair of studies looking into the proposed merger of Highmark Inc. and Independence Blue Cross gave no clear answer to the question of whether the state's insurance deparment should approve the deal.

A report from LECG Inc., an Emeryville, Calif.-based company that offers expert testimony and analysis, said whether state law dictates that consolidation not be approved depends on how market share is defined. Another, by New York-based international financial consulting firm The Blackstone Group, was not conclusive as to whether the deal would fail to benefit policyholders and hurt network access. Blackstone said it had found no evidence that it would but noted that further data could change that conclusion.

The reports reflect the various definitions that regulators, experts, physicians and the plans themselves have offered in debating whether a Highmark-Independence merger should be approved. The Pennsylvania Dept. of Insurance commissioned the reports, released in early September, to help determine if it should approve the deal.

"In terms of the definition of what a market share is, the answer is going to be a combination of fact and interpretation of law," said Melissa Fox, a spokeswoman for state Insurance Commissioner Joel Ario. "Everything on the table will be considered."

The LECG report said that, assuming the two compete in a statewide market and using premiums as a measure of market control, the consolidated firm would have too large a market share as defined by the state statute that applies to mergers.

But if the market is examined by product line and region and is based on where employers that buy group health policies are located, then the two companies would not be considered too dominant, at least in the commercial group insurance line. Alternately, if defined by where members live, the combined commercial group health business would be too large under state law.

Blackstone's analysis is ongoing, and parts of its report are incomplete pending more information from Highmark and Independence Blue Cross. Therefore, Blackstone said it was not yet possible to say whether the consolidation would violate the conditions for mergers laid out in state law.

Consolidation opposed

The Pennsylvania Medical Society, the AMA and the Hospital and Healthsystem Assn. of Pennsylvania oppose the consolidation out of concern that the new firm would hold an excessively dominant position in the health insurance market across the state.

PMS spokesman Chuck Moran said the group was evaluating the reports and was not ready to comment on them. Moran said the medical society is preparing testimony for an Oct. 7 hearing before the state Senate Banking and Insurance Committee.

The U.S. Dept. of Justice has approved the deal, so the decision now rests with Ario. The commissioner's office held a series of public hearings in July and is accepting written comments through Oct. 10. A decision is expected by year's end.

If Highmark, based in Pittsburgh, and Independence Blue Cross, based in Philadelphia, were to consolidate as requested, the new entity would be the third-largest Blues plan by enrollment, with an estimated 8 million members and $23 billion in annual revenue. according to the Blackstone report. WellPoint, which operates 14 for-profit Blues plans, has 34.2 million members, and HealthCare Service Corp., which owns four nonprofit Blues plans, has 12.3 million.

The LECG report examined the competitive landscape in Pennsylvania and evaluated a completed merger's potential impact on that landscape, including the likelihood that Highmark would enter the Philadelphia area market if not for the merger. Highmark officials have said they would not consider competing in that market.

But LECG's analysis found otherwise. "Overall, the evidence suggests that there is a distinct possibility that Highmark would enter southeastern Pennsylvania absent the consolidation going forward," the LECG study said. "If such entry occurred, it is likely that both health insurance customers and health care providers would benefit."

The report weighed the prospect of Highmark entering the Philadelphia market specifically in light of the results of Highmark's competition with a third Blues plan, Capital BlueCross, in central Pennsylvania.

That competition hasn't reduced premiums for members, but it has produced better reimbursements for physicians, the consultants found.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Measuring market share

A report commissioned by the Pennsylvania Insurance Dept. found that a combined Highmark-Independence Blue Cross by at least one method of analysis would hold too great a market share to be allowed under state law. Here is a summary of the two plans' statewide market share by direct premiums written by line of business, as defined by the National Assn. of Insurance Commissioners.

Market share
Line of business Highmark IBC Combined
Group comprehensive 27.8% 35.7% 63.5%
Individual comprehensive 64.8% 18.7% 83.5%
Federal employee health benefit 40.5% 24.0% 64.5%
Medicare supplement 70.8% 13.0% 83.8%
Title VIII Medicare 36.3% 27.2% 63.5%
Title XIX Medicaid 16.0% 30.6% 46.6%
Vision only 30.2% 12.8% 43.0%
Dental only 72.4% 0% 72.4%
Other 29.5% 11.1% 40.6%
Commercial (risk-based only) 30.6% 34.0% 64.5%

Source: LECG Inc. report to the Pennsylvania Insurance Dept. (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn