Government

House EHR bill mixes Medicare physician bonuses with cuts

Congress is unlikely to address additional health information technology legislation before 2009.

By David Glendinning — Posted Oct. 6, 2008

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Physicians would receive additional Medicare funds to implement electronic health records systems under a bill introduced by Rep. Pete Stark (D, Calif.) in September. For doctors who did not take the government up on that offer, Medicare penalties would start kicking in just as the bonuses are tapering off.

The Health-e Information Technology Act of 2008 would provide yearly bonuses starting in 2013 to every physician who has put into operation a federally approved EHR. The total additional payments would max out at just more than $40,000 over five years. Those who did not have a system in place by 2016 would start receiving Medicare reductions eventually reaching 3% annually, unless the physician could obtain a five-year hardship exemption.

Other bill provisions would establish a federal advisory panel tasked with finalizing health IT standards by 2011, provide additional grant money and open-source technology to doctors who needed it, and employ new security rules for the protection of confidential patient data in EHRs. Medicare bonuses would kick in more quickly if the open-source technology becomes available before 2013.

"If we want a uniform, interoperable health care system in America, time has shown us that we can't depend on the private sector to do it on their own," Stark said. "This is the perfect role for government. We should work with stakeholders to develop the standards, ensure an affordable product is available and pay providers to adopt it."

Stark, who is the House Ways and Means health subcommittee chair, modeled his incentive plan on a Medicare electronic prescribing measure enacted in July. Under that law, physicians who use e-prescribing technology would receive federal bonuses starting next year but would see penalties starting in 2012 if they are not compliant with the mandate.

The American Medical Association, which supported the Medicare physician payment legislation that contained this requirement, gave a nod to the federal assistance in Stark's bill and in several other pending health IT measures in Congress.

"The AMA commends members of Congress, including Chairman Stark, for recognizing the importance of moving toward an interoperable, nationwide health IT infrastructure and for recognizing the crucial role the federal government plays in assisting the health care industry accelerate the adoption and implementation of health IT systems and tools," said AMA Board of Trustees Chair-elect Rebecca J. Patchin, MD.

Stark expressed an interest in quickly moving the legislation to the full Ways and Means committee for consideration. Congressional aides acknowledged, however, that action on the measure before the end of the session is unlikely given the short time frame and the issue's complexity.

The Stark bill may figure prominently in the health IT debate in 2009 because of its use of the dual financial incentive tracks for adoption, a concept that found legislative success in the e-prescribing debate earlier this year. Other pending bills incorporate bonuses for physician adopters but don't reduce pay for those whose patient records stay on paper.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Incentives at both ends

Physicians who adopt federally approved electronic health records systems would receive Medicare bonuses under legislation recently introduced by Rep. Pete Stark (D, Calif.). Those additional payments would be temporary, but the eventual penalties for noncompliance would not.

Incentive Penalty
2013 $15,000 None
2014 $12,000 None
2015 $8,000 None
2016 $4,000 1%
2017 $2,000 1.5%
2018 None 2%
2019 None 2.5%
2020 and
beyond
None 3%

Note: Penalty is represented as a percent of annual Medicare pay.

Source: The Health-e Information Technology Act of 2008 (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn