Washington becomes 2nd state to allow physician-assisted suicide

Nearly 60% of voters approved the measure. Aid-in-dying advocates ponder which state to target next.

By Kevin B. O’Reilly — Posted Nov. 24, 2008

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Fourteen years after a slight majority of Oregon voters made their state the first to allow physician-assisted suicide, a Washington ballot initiative nearly identical to Oregon's law was approved with 58% of the vote.

"It was a resounding win," said Peg Sandeen, executive director of the Portland-based Death With Dignity National Center, whose political action committee raised more than $615,000 for the ballot fight. "That's a trouncing any sort of politician would be glad to win anyplace."

The group's board plans to meet in November and December to analyze which state to target next.

"We really believe this is a people's movement," Sandeen said. "The legislatures are still afraid" of physician-assisted suicide. She predicted it will take two to three years to mount another state ballot drive. Planning for Washington's physician-assisted suicide ballot measure, Initiative 1000, began in 2005.

I-1000 supporters brought a big financial edge to their campaign. They raised more than $5.5 million, while opponents brought in $1.6 million, the Seattle Post-Intelligencer reported.

The Washington win ended a decade and a half of losses for aid-in-dying advocates eager to find a state willing to follow Oregon's lead. More than three dozen bills in 13 states were stymied, with none ever reaching a governor's desk. Ballot initiatives in Michigan and Maine failed -- the former by a wide margin, thanks to the specter of Jack Kevorkian, MD, and his suicide machine. Maine's failed by a 51% to 49% margin.

Oregon's law has been continually challenged. It was put on hold until a 1997 repeal attempt was defeated at the polls. Then, in 2001, U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft issued a directive stating that physicians who wrote lethal prescriptions under the Oregon Death With Dignity Act were in violation of the Controlled Substances Act. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in January 2006 that Ashcroft's order exceeded his authority.

From 1998 to 2007, 341 Oregonians with terminal illnesses ended their lives early with the help of deadly medications prescribed by their doctors. Another 35 people had taken life-ending drug doses by Nov. 5, according to Compassion & Choices of Oregon, a group that helps patients use the Death With Dignity Act.

As in Oregon, the Washington law makes physician-assisted suicide available only to patients who have been judged terminally ill by two doctors. Patients must make an oral request and a witnessed written request. Another oral request must be made 15 days later. Physicians must tell patients about options such as hospice and palliative care.

If either physician believes the patient has a psychiatric disorder impairing judgment, the patient must be referred for counseling. Doctors ordering deadly prescriptions will have to comply with reporting requirements to be set by the state health department. The information doctors report will not be publicly available, but the health department is required to release an annual statistical report. The law takes effect March 4, 2009.

The Washington State Medical Assn. opposed the ballot measure and offered physicians free "vote no" brochures for their waiting rooms. The organization's leadership decided before the election to respect the voters' decision and has "no plans to actively fight or try to repeal the initiative," a WSMA spokeswoman said.

The AMA "strongly opposes any bill to legalize physician-assisted suicide" because the practice is "fundamentally inconsistent with the physician's role as healer."

Seattle-area radiologist Shane E. Macaulay, MD, said I-1000's victory represents a misguided view of how to care for dying patients.

"The approach that the advocates of assisted suicide bring to end-of-life care represents a failure on their part of vision and understanding the options that exist in end-of-life care," said Dr. Macaulay, a WSMA delegate who volunteered for the Coalition Against Assisted Suicide, a group that opposed I-1000. A physician's duty is to offer patients with terminal illnesses good pain control and access to hospice, "to stand with patients, not help them die," he said.

Mitchell Kahn, MD, voted for the Washington ballot initiative. He said he would be willing to prescribe a lethal dose of medication for a terminally ill patient under the new law, noting he already is committed to helping dying patients experience as little pain as possible. "It's a small step to make sure the patient has enough meds to do himself in if that's what he wants to do," said Dr. Kahn, a Bellingham, Wash., internist. "Some people say there's an ethical divide there. I see it as a continuum."

Linda Ganzini, MD, MPH, is the leading expert on Oregon's decade-long experience with aid in dying. She said there are ways to help patients avoid physician-assisted suicide.

"The key issue is to make sure patients in Washington have access to hospice and access to good palliative care," said Dr. Ganzini, professor of psychiatry and medicine at Oregon Health and Science University. "Our research shows that's the single intervention most likely to cause people who have requested lethal prescriptions to change their minds."

Back to top


Religion's role

Like next-door neighbor Oregon, Washington has a relatively high percentage of voters who say they have no religious affiliation. It was these voters who were key to Initiative 1000's landslide win.

Religious affiliation Percent of vote Yes No
Protestant 56% 50% 50%
Catholic 15% 50% 50%
None 19% 80% 20%

Source: Exit poll of 1,233 voters, as reported on

Back to top

Michigan OKs use of new embryonic stem cell lines from fertility treatments

Michigan voters overturned a state law that threatened up to 10 years in prison and $10 million in fines for scientists who create new embryonic stem cell lines.

Voters approved Proposal 2 by a 53% to 47% margin.

The old statute, passed after the Dolly sheep cloning controversy, permitted scientists to work with stem cells derived from embryonic stem cell lines created elsewhere. Under the voter-approved law, scientists may only use embryos left from fertility treatments.

The ballot fight, the latest state-level battle over research rules and funding, attracted more than $5 million each in spending from the measure's supporters and its opponents, according to the Detroit Free Press.

Stem cell scientists applauded the victory. "This outcome means that critical medical research can proceed in Michigan without political or ideological interference," George Q. Daley, MD, PhD, said in a statement. Dr. Daley is past president of the International Society for Stem Cell Research.

Opponents argued the proposal, which bars counties and towns from passing any additional regulations on stem cell science, was a blueprint for "unrestricted" research.

Supporters nationally cheered the victory of President-elect Barack Obama who has pledged to overturn President Bush's restrictions on embryonic stem cell science funding.

Back to top

External links

Initiative Measure No. 1000: The Washington Death With Dignity Act (link)

End-of-life resources for physicians, Washington State Medical Assn. (link)

Information from YES! on I-1000/Washington Death With Dignity Act (link)

Information from the Coalition Against Assisted Suicide (link)

Back to top



Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story

Read story


American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story

Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story

Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story

Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story

Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story

Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story

Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn