Business

Model law banning silent PPOs could serve as draft for state legislatures

The legislation spells out how to bar unauthorized third-party network rental and allows physicians to deny discounts to insurers they have not contracted with.

By Emily Berry — Posted Dec. 29, 2008

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

State lawmakers considering a ban on physician network rentals, sometimes known to doctors as "silent PPOs," now have a starting point from which to draft legislation -- one that requires transparency and sets boundaries for when buying access to a doctor's discounted rate is allowed.

After three years of lobbying, debate and discussion, the National Conference of Insurance Legislators at its annual meeting on Nov. 23, 2008, adopted a model law governing network rentals. It was supported by the American Medical Association.

Susan Nolan, NCOIL executive director, said many states are set to consider network rental rules in 2009. "We felt like we really provided a model when folks needed it."

Jordan Estey, NCOIL director of legislative affairs & education, said five states -- Connecticut, Colorado, Florida, Indiana and Ohio -- over the past two years have passed laws governing third-party network access that are similar to the model adopted by NCOIL.

The model requires that insurers disclose to doctors accurate information when a contract is accessed by a third party and bars unauthorized use of network discounts.

Under the model law, the third party renting a network must abide by the terms of the original contract, and physicians have a right to deny discounts to insurers who don't follow those rules. That means that a third-party insurer who gets access to a network discount for a physician must also direct patients to the physician as if he or she were in-network and generally grant him the benefits of a network physician.

"I think this is a very big deal, and assuming this will provide a basis for states that have not passed laws similar to this already, if then those laws are passed it will provide physicians the ability to have transparency in the contracts they sign," said Jeremy A. Lazarus, MD, a psychiatrist from Greenwood Village, Colo., and speaker of the AMA House of Delegates.

"This national group put together a bill they think is reasonable, that has already been vetted, and I think that will make it easier for other states to pass these bills," he said.

The discussion of network rentals and silent PPOs began with a request from the AMA, Estey said, which brought the issue to NCOIL in 2005. An effort to pass an AMA-authored model stalled, as did efforts for more than a year to try to get doctors and insurers to come together to draft a jointly proposed model law, he said.

The final version is a blend of proposals from the AMA and trade groups America's Health Insurance Plans and the American Assn. of Preferred Provider Organizations, Estey said. An NCOIL committee held nine conference calls between its summer 2008 meeting and its November 2008 meeting to hammer out each part of the model it ultimately adopted, Estey said.

The final version includes some key items that the AMA requested:

  • Rather than granting an exemption for self-insured plans, each state is directed to decide whether its law will apply to plans that are funded by employers and administered by health plans.
  • Insurance companies can't share network discounts with their subsidiaries and affiliates without following the network rental rules.

The model legislation does not keep plans from re-renting rental networks, a practice that creates the potential for a tangle of network rentals that would be difficult for a physician to unravel.

At least one legislator plans to bring the NCOIL model in hand as a proposed law for colleagues to consider in 2009 -- state representative Charlie Curtiss, a Democrat from Sparta, Tenn. Curtiss is chair of the Tennessee House commerce committee, which considers insurance legislation.

He said he began drafting a bill for his state in December 2008, based on the NCOIL model, and plans to introduce it when the Legislature reconvenes in January.

Curtiss is a member of NCOIL. During the debate over the model law, he argued for physicians' rights to know who is accessing network discounts.

"A health care provider, a doctor, should have just as much right to be in control of their business as anyone else," he said. "I describe [a silent PPO] as a 'discount ambush,' " he said.

Robert Zirkelbach, spokesman for America's Health Insurance Plans, said it wouldn't be surprising to see five or more states take up the issue in 2009. He said AHIP will be taking its own model to legislators in 2009, since it wasn't altogether satisfied with the one NCOIL adopted.

"NCOIL should be applauded for addressing this issue," he said, "We do have some concerns with the final NCOIL results adopted."

He said AHIP specifically objects to the model law's prohibition against insurers using one set of network discounts across all affiliates and subsidiaries, and wanted NCOIL to specify that none of the law's rules should apply to self-funded plans, in which the employer bears risk and hires a health plan simply for administrative work. AAPPO did not return phone calls seeking comment.

Courts have recently begun allowing some state regulation of those types of plans, though they have historically been governed by the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act.

Back to top


ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Model legislation

The National Conference of Insurance Legislators in November 2008 adopted a model law for states considering regulating network rentals and banning so-called "silent PPOs." The essential parts of the model law are given in these excerpts.

Part A

A contracting entity may not grant access to a provider's health care services and contractual discounts pursuant to a provider network contract unless:

1. The provider network contract specifically states that the contracting entity may enter into an agreement with a third party allowing the third party to obtain the contracting entity's rights and responsibilities under the provider network contract as if the third party were the contracting entity; and

2. The third party accessing the provider network contract is contractually obligated to comply with all applicable terms, limitations, and conditions of the provider network contract.

Part B

A contracting entity that grants access to a provider's health care services and contractual discounts pursuant to a provider network contract shall:

1. Identify and provide to the provider, upon request at the time a provider network contract is entered into with a provider, a written or electronic list of all third parties known at the time of contracting, to which the contracting entity has or will grant access to the provider's health care services and contractual discounts pursuant to a provider network contract;

2. Maintain an Internet Web site or other readily available mechanism, such as a toll-free telephone number, through which a provider may obtain a listing, updated at least every 90 days, of the third parties to which the contracting entity or another third party has executed contracts to grant access to such provider's health care services and contractual discounts pursuant to a provider network contract;

3. Provide the third party with sufficient information regarding the provider network contract to enable the third party to comply with all relevant terms, limitations, and conditions of the provider network contract;

4. Require that the third party who contracts with the contracting entity to gain access to the provider network contract identify the source of the contractual discount taken by the third party on each remittance advice (RA) or explanation of payment (EOP) form furnished to a health care provider when such discount is pursuant to the contracting entity's provider network contract; and

5. (a) Notify the third party who contracts with the contracting entity to gain access to the provider network contract of the termination of the provider network contract no later than (insert number) days prior to the effective date of the final termination of the provider network contract; and

(b) Require those that are by contract eligible to claim the right to access a provider's discounted rate to cease claiming entitlement to those rates or other contracted rights or obligations for services rendered after termination of the provider network contract.

(c) The notice required under subsection IV(B)(5)(a) can be provided through any reasonable means, including but not limited to: written notice, electronic communication, or an update to electronic database or other provider listing.

Source:National Conference of Insurance Legislators

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn