Opinion

Put the tobacco settlement money in smoking cessation

States need to spend more of their tobacco settlement money on cessation and prevention programs.

Posted Dec. 29, 2008.

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Nov. 23, 1998, was a notable and optimistic day in the fight against smoking. Forty-six states settled their lawsuits against the major tobacco firms to recover smoking-related medical costs. They, along with the four states -- Mississippi, Florida, Texas and Minnesota -- that had reached earlier individual settlements would receive annual payments from the tobacco companies far into the future, including a collective $246 billion in the first 25 years.

The settlement didn't dictate how the states were to spend that money. But many state leaders promised to use the bulk of it for smoking cessation and prevention to fight the No. 1 preventable cause of death in the United States -- diseases associated with the use of tobacco products.

So 10 years after the settlement, how have the states done in following through on the promises of that auspicious November day?

Very poorly, according to a report recently issued by the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.

The report by the campaign, which includes the American Medical Association among its members, found that with hundreds of billions of dollars collectively available each year from settlement money and tobacco tax revenue, states do not even come close to their promises for spending on smoking cessation and prevention. They don't even come close to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-recommended levels of spending, which would be merely 15% of that money.

AMA policy supports using tobacco settlement money almost exclusively for smoking prevention and cessation programs -- even the balance of the money has to be spent on health services. The AMA also supports tobacco tax increases, with a "substantial" amount of the proceeds to be used for health programs, smoking cessation and efforts to counter tobacco company advertising.

In the last 10 years, states have received $79.2 billion of settlement money, along with another $124.3 billion from tobacco taxes. Yet the report found that only $6.5 billion -- 3.2% -- was devoted during that time to smoking prevention and cessation programs. No state has reached the CDC-recommended funding level, though North Dakota could do so in 2010 after voters passed an initiative dictating that amount of spending on tobacco programs.

This lack of spending persists even though there is ample evidence that every dollar spent makes a huge impact.

As an example, the report cites a study in the August 2008 PloS Medicine, a peer-reviewed journal published by the Public Library of Science, finding that the $1.8 billion California spent fighting tobacco use over the last 15 years resulted in $86 billion in health care savings. That is $50 saved for every $1 spent on smoking prevention and cessation.

Even at current rates of spending, states in theory should be able to make more progress, as there is an extra $1 billion spread out each of the next 10 years in tobacco litigation settlement payments. But other money marks a threat to that progress.

Tobacco companies, themselves, are increasing their marketing budgets -- they nearly doubled from $6.9 billion in 1998 to $13.4 billion in 2005, according to the latest information available from the Federal Trade Commission.

Meanwhile, the current economic recession has state budgets in crisis. States will be greatly tempted to raid tobacco money to fill budget holes, as many did between 2002 and 2005. That's when smoking-related spending was cut 28% during a time of fiscal pressure. It is a temptation that should be avoided. The CDC found that when that spending was cut, the rate of adult smoking stopped falling.

Spending money on tobacco cessation and prevention is like a vaccine -- effective prevention against having to treat the diseases associated with smoking. If states pay now, they won't have to pay later. Regrettably, had they properly spent settlement money earlier, they wouldn't have as much of the costly and tragic smoking-related disease they face today.

Back to top


External links

"A Decade of Broken Promises: The 1998 State Tobacco Settlement Ten Years Later," Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, November 2008 (link)

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn