Government

House Democrats silence alarm on higher Medicare spending

Republicans crafted the trigger mechanism in 2003, but President Bush never had the chance to take advantage of the legislative fast track for cutting Medicare.

By David Glendinning — Posted Jan. 23, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The Democratic-controlled House once again has turned off a warning built into 2003 Medicare statute designed to force lawmakers to confront the issue of rising program spending. This time the silence could last two years.

By a largely party-line vote, the House on Jan. 6 approved a package of rule changes, one of which turned off the Medicare alarm for the rest of the 111th Congress. That warning was first tripped in April 2007, when Medicare trustees predicted for the second year in a row that the portion of total Medicare spending coming from general revenues would exceed 45% within six years. Spending on physician care, hospital care and other services are funded through a combination of general taxes, payroll taxes and beneficiary premiums.

When the alarm sounded in 2007, it established a special fast track for President Bush's proposed Medicare cuts to receive a House vote last year, but Democratic lawmakers stopped the fast track by passing a stand-alone resolution in July 2008. Bush had proposed a package of Medicare reductions that did not include outright cuts to physician pay, but it would have implemented pay-for-performance and public quality reporting for doctors in the program. The 2003 statute does not affect how Medicare reductions receive consideration in the Senate.

In defending their latest action on the Medicare funding alarm, Democratic leaders reiterated that the 45% trigger is an arbitrary measure of Medicare's fiscal health. The original, GOP-drafted procedures "were so poorly drafted that they would allow members to offer unrelated, non-germane and fiscally irresponsible amendments that would have no tendency to address Medicare's long-term financing issues," House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D, Md.) said in a statement.

But Republican leaders countered that Democrats are ignoring a real problem with long-term entitlement spending that will not go away simply by silencing the alarm. Experts expect that as long as Congress does not make major reforms, each annual Medicare trustees report will trigger the warning anew.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn