Government

States taking small steps on health system reform

Legislation has targeted better cost and quality transparency, as well as interoperable health IT networks.

By Doug Trapp — Posted March 6, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Although states appear to have lost their appetites for Massachusetts-style comprehensive coverage legislation, they continue to pursue more incremental health system reforms, says a recent report by health insurers.

For example, nine states in 2008 adopted laws requiring physicians or hospitals to report infection rates, prices, or other quality and cost information. About 25 states have embraced such transparency laws in the past three years, said Susan Laudicina, author of "State Legislative Health Care and Insurance Issues," an annual survey released Feb. 20 by the BlueCross BlueShield Assn. Laudicina is the association's director of state research and policy.

Ten states in recent years have adopted legislation allowing health plans to offer wellness incentives, including Georgia and New York in 2008. This is a reversal from the past, when "offering incentives used to be banned in some states because they were considered unfair discrimination," Laudicina said.

States continue to reduce their ranks of uninsured by passing laws requiring health plans to continue offering coverage for dependent children older than 18 -- sometimes into their mid-20s or even up to age 30. In addition, 33 states have adopted legislation in the past three years to lay the groundwork for statewide interoperable data networks in anticipation of federal policy action on health information technology, she said.

Massachusetts' near-universal coverage law in 2006 spawned many pieces of copycat legislation in 2007 and 2008, but that trend has sputtered, Laudicina said. So far this year, lawmakers in only two states -- Alaska and Nebraska -- have introduced bills with employer or individual insurance mandates, she said.

Massachusetts requires most people to acquire health insurance coverage -- possibly through a state-subsidized health insurance exchange -- or face tax penalties. Employers who don't offer coverage must pay a fine.

Laudicina said Massachusetts had several advantages other states do not, such as a relatively healthy population, high rates of employer-sponsored coverage, a fund for uncompensated care and more than $700 million in federal funds available to support the effort.

Instead of adopting comprehensive coverage bills similar to the Massachusetts law, states are creating commissions to study how universal coverage could be achieved in ways that best fit. "States are not going to quit," she said.

Information on the association's report is available online (link).

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn