Government

Medicare equipment bidding rule delayed

CMS wants more time to study the details of the regulation, which lays the groundwork for the return of DME competitive bidding.

By Chris Silva — Posted March 6, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The Obama administration has postponed for 60 days the effective date of a Medicare rule that prepares for the 2010 return of a competitive bidding program for durable medical equipment.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services launched the bidding program July 1, 2008, in an attempt to lower DME costs, enhance quality and prevent fraud. Under the initiative, beneficiaries in selected areas who needed certain equipment were required to obtain it from suppliers chosen by the government through a bidding process. But the initiative was shelved after only about two weeks when lawmakers agreed to an 18-month moratorium.

In preparation for the restart of the program in January 2010, CMS published an interim final regulation Jan. 15 detailing several changes to the original program that were required by Congress. Revisions included stipulating that certain DME items, such as rehabilitative power wheelchairs, are excluded from competitive bidding.

The interim final regulation, which was to take effect Feb. 17, is on hold until April 18. The agency cited the need for further review of the revisions before moving forward.

In one of its first actions in January, the Obama White House sent out a memo asking federal agencies to consider extending for 60 days the effective date of any Bush administration regulations that had been published in the Federal Register but had not taken effect. The delay on the competitive bidding rule was urged by DME suppliers, who oppose the program, saying it could result in beneficiary access problems.

The American Assn. for Homecare, which represents suppliers, said in comments dated Feb. 12 that the roughly two weeks of operation of the competitive bidding program in 2008 "was fraught with delays, conflicting guidance and system failures." In addition, some physicians who supply selected types of equipment as a convenience to their patients expressed concerns they would never be able to compete effectively against major supply firms when it came to Medicare bids.

CMS is accepting comments on the reopened DME bidding program rule until March 23.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn