Opinion

What editorial writers are saying about electronic health records

As part of the federal stimulus package, $19 billion is being devoted to expanding the use of health information technology.

Posted April 27, 2009.

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

The objective behind EHR promotion is to improve efficiency and quality of care. A sampling of newspapers across the country shows some lingering concerns.

A health tech monopoly

The stimulus hands the Obama administration the power to define and approve "certified" records, therefore the power to create a health-tech monopoly. With stimulus money being shoveled out as quickly as possible, doctors and hospitals may end up prematurely investing in the costly systems that happen to have the government seal of approval -- and in the process freezing out an innovative marketplace. Wall Street Journal, April 13

Miles to go on e-health matters

President Obama is counting on electronic health records to help modernize the nation's dysfunctional health care system, improve the quality of care and reduce its cost. ... There is a long way to go. ... The main impediment is money. ... The president's stimulus plan should help ease the financial obstacles. New York Times, April 2

The doctor and others will see you

Electronic medical records -- known as EMRs -- offer the potential to improve, customize and expedite treatment with the click of a computer mouse. ... Electronic medical records [also] hold the potential to ruin lives quickly and easily -- through mistakes and abuse by anyone with access to them, legitimately or otherwise. ... The goal underneath all of this is simple: providing timely access to patients' medical information so doctors can give the best care possible as it is needed. It's a worthy goal, so it's worth figuring out how to meet the many challenges of achieving it. Carefully, very carefully. The Town Talk, Alexandria, La., April 1

Heading off health care inflation

The administration is laying great import on efficiency, "yet it's still quite difficult to quantify what the impact will be in 2045 or 2050, because there's not enough knowledge about exactly what would work," [White House Budget Director Peter] Orszag admitted. That's welcome honesty, but also a reminder that these efforts -- while moving in the right direction -- are also fraught with complexities. Christian Science Monitor, March 25

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn