Government

Medicaid drug management may reduce access

Patients with medication access problems were more than three times as likely as others to experience an adverse event, a new report suggests.

By Doug Trapp — Posted May 21, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Patients in states with Medicaid drug utilization management programs reported more drug access problems and adverse events than those in states without such programs, according to a report published in the May issue of Psychiatric Services (link).

Psychiatrists in 10 states reported either a medication access problem or a continuity of care problem for nearly half of their patients in the previous year, said the study, based on a survey of 600 psychiatrists between September and December 2006. Psychiatrists reported the lowest percentage of patient access problems in California, New York and Texas -- about 30% -- compared with about 64% in, Georgia, Michigan and Tennessee.

The physicians most commonly said patients could not access clinically directed medication because the state Medicaid program did not cover the drug or because the program required co-payments for the drug. States most commonly excluded second-generation antipsychotics, sedatives, antidepressants and stimulants, the report said. Patients with an access or continuity problem were 3.6 times as likely to have an adverse event as those who had no problem. Adverse events included hospitalization, emergency treatment, incarceration or homelessness, after adjusting for patient case mix.

"Medicaid prescription drug management policies that are based primarily on cost rather than clinical considerations may result in significant human, economic and social costs," said study co-author Joyce C. West, PhD, MPP, senior scientist with the American Psychiatric Institute for Research and Education. Other study authors are affiliated with Rutgers University Center for Pharmacotherapy, Georgetown University's Dept. of Psychiatry and Walter Reed Army Institute of Research.

But Ann Kohler, director of the National Assn. of State Medicaid Directors, doubted the article was correct. "Generally states do not put limitations on antipsychotic drugs. And when they do put prior authorizations in place, they do dispense any medically necessary drugs," she said.

Study authors acknowledged the report's limitations, including the possibility that physicians whose patients had drug access problems might have been more likely to respond than other doctors. Also, doctors may not have had accurate information on their state's Medicaid drug formularies, which are often complex.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn