Business

Florida insurers forced to honor assignment of benefits

An intense legislative campaign ended with the governor's signature on a law requiring insurers to pay out-of-network physicians directly.

By Emily Berry — Posted July 8, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

Florida has become the latest of only a handful of states that require health insurers to pay out-of-network physicians directly rather than send reimbursements to patients.

The state's new assignment-of-benefits law took effect July 1.

Florida Gov. Charlie Crist was lobbied hard by health insurers who wanted him to veto the bill, but in the end he followed the will of the Legislature, said Florida Medical Assn. spokeswoman Lynne Takacs.

"We're pretty proud of it," she said. "It was a David-versus-Goliath-type effort." Physicians who supported the legislation sent more than 1,000 letters to Crist, she said.

Health insurers, including BlueCross BlueShield of Florida, lobbied against the bill at the capital and with TV ads, warning it would cost the company and prompt increased balance billing.

"Our concern on the part of some of our members still is that direct payment to providers is an important benefit from a provider contracting with a health plan," said Jim Bracher, executive vice president of the Florida Assn. of Health Plans, which opposed the bill.

"That benefit will be lost, and you're faced with the possibility you have providers leaving your network and more persons will be getting balance billed."

In the letter accompanying his June 10 signature, the governor said he hoped the new law would ensure that patients could access care in or out of a health plan's network.

"I am pleased that this legislation removes a health care access barrier that hindered a provider's right to receive payment for rendering services," the letter said.

Florida passed reforms last year that included a requirement to pay network physicians directly. But a section of that bill that would have required paying out-of-network doctors directly was removed during the legislative session, because it "threatened to torpedo the whole bill," Takacs said.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn