Government

EHR guidelines raise privacy concerns

A patient coalition is worried that the proposed "meaningful use" standards that await HHS approval wouldn't protect patients' records early enough.

By Chris Silva — Posted Aug. 20, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

A patient privacy coalition is not happy with recommendations released in July that outline how doctors and hospitals could use electronic health records in a way that qualifies for federal stimulus money. The group says key privacy regulations need to be enacted more quickly.

The recommendations on the "meaningful use" of electronic health records were developed by a working group within the Health IT Policy Committee and approved in July by David Blumenthal, MD, national health information technology coordinator. The guidelines are not official but instead serve as advice for the Dept. of Health and Human Services in drafting federal regulations.

If the proposed objectives are approved, physicians' EHR systems would need to meet certain standards by 2011, 2013 and 2015 to be eligible for federal EHR money through the economic stimulus package enacted in February.

But the Coalition for Patient Privacy, a network of state and national organizations and health IT corporations, said it is concerned with what it calls the policy committee's lack of attention to controlling sensitive health information. The coalition wants the requirements for some key privacy protections moved up from 2015 to 2011.

For example, a 2015 objective in the meaningful-use matrix calls on physicians to "protect sensitive health information to minimize reluctance of patient to seek care because of privacy concerns." Another 2015 objective states that patients must have access to EHR self-management tools.

"Patients need an effective seat at this table," said Deborah Peel, MD, a psychiatrist and chair of the Patient Privacy Rights Foundation, a watchdog group based in Austin, Texas, that is one of nine members of the coalition. "The consumers need to have the ability to decide when, where and with whom their information is shared. They also have to be able to trust the system up front; otherwise, [HHS officials] risk wasting billions in stimulus money."

Other members of the coalition include Consumer Action, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn