Profession

Bioethicists fight myths over rationing, end-of-life care

A new bioethics group speaks out on whether proposed health system reforms would violate patients' rights to late-life medical care.

By Kevin B. O’Reilly — Posted Sept. 2, 2009

Print  |   Email  |   Respond  |   Reprints  |   Like Facebook  |   Share Twitter  |   Tweet Linkedin

In the battle over health system reform, debate has centered on issues such as expanding insurance coverage, containing costs and setting up a government-run plan to compete with private health insurers.

But as Congress recessed in August, critics of Democratic reform plans targeted a provision in the House legislation that would reimburse physicians for counseling patients about their end-of-life care options. Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential candidate, falsely said the measure called for "death panels" that could deny care to patients who are elderly or disabled.

It was such rhetoric about the central terrain of medical ethics and patient autonomy that led a new group, the Assn. of Bioethics Program Directors, to speak up. The group, which represents the directors of 60 bioethics programs with two or more full-time staffers at medical schools in the U.S. and Canada, issued a statement seeking to dispel what it called "three myths about the ethics of health care reform" (link).

Myth No. 1, the group said, is that reform would mean that patients would surrender control of their health care decisions. Myth No. 2 is that reform would control costs by depriving patients of useful but costly interventions. As myth No. 3, the group listed the notion that "health care reform will deny older Americans medical treatments at the end of life."

That last one "was the most pernicious myth because it got traction because it was based on a made-up claim," said Jeffrey Kahn, PhD, MPH, the group's president and director of the University of Minnesota Center for Bioethics.

"It's wrong in so many ways," Kahn added. "We wanted to poke a hole in that. A lot of what the field of bioethics has worked on in the last 30 years are exactly those issues -- helping people make better decisions at the end of life. And here comes a provision exactly for that purpose, and it was being twisted around as a claim for government-funded death panels. That hit very close to home for us."

The group was formed partly so that bioethicists could speak out more forcefully on matters of public concern, Kahn said.

"This seemed like an area about which we have a stake and something to say," Kahn said. "Whether people think it's important that we speak is up to them to decide. ... I don't imagine it will be the last time."

Back to top


ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISE HERE


Featured
Read story

Confronting bias against obese patients

Medical educators are starting to raise awareness about how weight-related stigma can impair patient-physician communication and the treatment of obesity. Read story


Read story

Goodbye

American Medical News is ceasing publication after 55 years of serving physicians by keeping them informed of their rapidly changing profession. Read story


Read story

Policing medical practice employees after work

Doctors can try to regulate staff actions outside the office, but they must watch what they try to stamp out and how they do it. Read story


Read story

Diabetes prevention: Set on a course for lifestyle change

The YMCA's evidence-based program is helping prediabetic patients eat right, get active and lose weight. Read story


Read story

Medicaid's muddled preventive care picture

The health system reform law promises no-cost coverage of a lengthy list of screenings and other prevention services, but some beneficiaries still might miss out. Read story


Read story

How to get tax breaks for your medical practice

Federal, state and local governments offer doctors incentives because practices are recognized as economic engines. But physicians must know how and where to find them. Read story


Read story

Advance pay ACOs: A down payment on Medicare's future

Accountable care organizations that pay doctors up-front bring practice improvements, but it's unclear yet if program actuaries will see a return on investment. Read story


Read story

Physician liability: Your team, your legal risk

When health care team members drop the ball, it's often doctors who end up in court. How can physicians improve such care and avoid risks? Read story

  • Stay informed
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • RSS
  • LinkedIn